| Author | |
PPTSS |
Subject: Avengers Movie Damage: Who's gonna pay for that? (possible spoilers) Posted Sun May 20, 2012 at 10:59:41 pm EDT (Viewed 43 times) |
|
| |
|
Kind of a neat article examining who should incur the cost to rebuild Midtown Manhattan in the wake of the battle with the Chitauri. For your consideration: http://lawandthemultiverse.com/2012/05/11/the-avengers-whos-gonna-pay-for-that/
Posted with Apple Safari 5.1.7 on MacOS X
| |
|
Drunk Stark |
Subject: FINE.. i'll pay [Re: PPTSS] Posted Mon May 21, 2012 at 08:01:15 am EDT (Viewed 15 times) |
|
| |
|
since i have more money then god, it's only fair i'll pay so there!
Posted with Mozilla Firefox 12.0 on MacOS X
| |
Hank Member Since: Fri Jul 01, 2011 |
Subject: Re: Avengers Movie Damage: Who's gonna pay for that? (possible spoilers) [Re: PPTSS] Posted Mon May 21, 2012 at 05:27:10 pm EDT (Viewed 206 times) |
|
| |
|
Quote: Kind of a neat article examining who should incur the cost to rebuild Midtown Manhattan in the wake of the battle with the Chitauri. For your consideration:Quote: http://lawandthemultiverse.com/2012/05/11/the-avengers-whos-gonna-pay-for-that/In the Comic Book universe Super Hero Insurance has been around for a bit. It was mentioned a bit in Damage Control. May be they got the same thing in the filmverse.
Posted with Mozilla Firefox 12.0 on Windows 7
| |
Gernot   Manager Location: St. Louis, MO Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008 Posts: 12,418 |
Subject: Superman Would've Had It Rebuilt Before You Even Reached For Your Wallet! ;) [Re: Drunk Stark] Posted Tue May 22, 2012 at 03:46:35 am EDT (Viewed 177 times) |
|
| |
|
Posted with Google Chrome 19.0.1084.46 on Windows Vista
| |
Reverend Meteor Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008 Posts: 11,689 |
Subject: Re: Avengers Movie Damage: Who's gonna pay for that? (possible spoilers) [Re: PPTSS] Posted Tue May 22, 2012 at 09:56:12 am EDT (Viewed 186 times) |
|
| |
|
Quote: Kind of a neat article examining who should incur the cost to rebuild Midtown Manhattan in the wake of the battle with the Chitauri. For your consideration:Quote: http://lawandthemultiverse.com/2012/05/11/the-avengers-whos-gonna-pay-for-that/Maybe it was just me but the Avengers seemed rather indifferent to the deaths of bystanders in the movie. They seemed to often knock them into buildings or grand central station. To me plenty of people died because of whichever direction the Avengers pushed the Shitauri. I'd be pretty pissed if you got my family killed trying to save someone else who was in their way...but I'm known to be petty. 
Posted with Mozilla Firefox 12.0 on Windows XP
| |
|
seeker Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008 Posts: 7,968 |
Subject: I think they had other things to worry about. [Re: Reverend Meteor] Posted Tue May 22, 2012 at 05:23:59 pm EDT (Viewed 177 times) |
|
| |
|
I can understand being upset if Thor accidentally set an invader into a building and said invader crashed into one's loved one. But given the circumstances I think it was unavoidable. You have about five six people going up against hundreds or more. Said invaders were chaotic enough they were everywhere. The sad things is that this is a war and the Avengers had other concerns at the moment. They tried containing the the invasion and recusing civilians as best they could, but in a chaotic battle like that with a high civilian population such deaths are almost unavoidable. If you were to substitute the Avengers with regular soldiers then you have stray bullets to worry about.
Posted with Mozilla Firefox 12.0 on Windows XP
| |
|
ChrisBechtloff |
Subject: Too bad Warner Bros cant get its act together to do a Justice Leauge movie. [Re: Gernot] Posted Wed May 23, 2012 at 07:33:04 pm EDT (Viewed 160 times) |
|
| |
|
With Avengers being such a hit they really can't claim 'it wouldnt work' anymore.
Posted with Microsoft Internet Explorer 5.0; on Windows 7
|
