Community
•
Avengers
•
Batman
•
Black Panther
•
Captain America
•
Comic Battles
•
Cosmic Marvel
•
DC Universe
•
Doctor Who
•
80's/90's
•
Fantastic Four
•
Flash
•
Game of Thrones
Golden/Silver/Bronze Age
•
Green Arrow
•
Green Lantern
•
Hulk
•
Indies
•
Iron Man
•
JLA
•
JSA
•
Marvel
•
Movies
•
Spider-Man
•
Star Trek
•
Star Wars
•
Superman
•
Television
•
Titans
•
Thor
The Walking Dead
•
Villains
•
Wonder Woman
•
X-Universe
Posts
•
Rules
•
FAQ
•
DC Guide
•
Marvel Guide
•
Second-String Sanctuary
•
ComicList
•
SpiderFan.org
Celebrating the 40th anniversary of Return of the Jedi
Comic Battle
>> View Post
Hello Guest ·
Log In
Settings
·
Register
Post By
thorfan
Subj:
Class 100, is it a poor way to rank strenght?
Posted: Sun Feb 16, 2014 at 09:56:16 am EST (Viewed 40 times)
New
Email
Print
RSS
Index
Next >>
We've seen the hulk way above class 100 showings, im sure that others have showings high above that also(probably anyone who's ever held up a building) in your opinion is It a good way to rank strength? In other words why not class 500, class 1000?
Posted with Mozilla 11.0 on Windows 7
New
Email
Print
RSS
Index
Class 100, is it a poor way to rank strenght?
· thorfan
· Sun Feb 16, 2014 at 09:56:16 am EST
The adjective rankings from the role playing game was much better.
(no text)
·
Anima Spiritia
· Mon Feb 17, 2014 at 10:00:59 am EST
Expecially combined with Green Yellow & Red results giving some variance
·
Incriptus
· Mon Feb 17, 2014 at 10:42:14 am EST
Re: Expecially combined with Green Yellow & Red results giving some variance
·
bd2999
· Mon Feb 17, 2014 at 08:31:01 pm EST
With the way Extra Effort and Power Stunts work, Mutants and Masterminds is amazing...
·
RodimusPrime
· Tue Feb 18, 2014 at 09:39:25 am EST
On a Scale of Potential or Limitless Strength, the numbers should be used as percentiles not tons....
· THUNDERER!
· Mon Feb 17, 2014 at 09:52:57 am EST
WTF is "below limitless"?
·
Would be Watcher
· Mon Feb 17, 2014 at 03:29:41 pm EST
any conceivable weight is below limitless, 100% means being capable or strong to be considered that strong....
· THUNDERER!
· Mon Feb 17, 2014 at 08:01:21 pm EST
Re: any conceivable weight is below limitless, 100% means being capable or strong to be considered that strong....
·
Would be Watcher
· Tue Feb 18, 2014 at 11:10:06 am EST
wow..now your just being difficult.
(no text)
· THUNDERER!
· Thu Feb 20, 2014 at 03:44:20 pm EST
How am I just being difficult?
·
Would be Watcher
· Fri Feb 21, 2014 at 03:14:03 pm EST
Re: any conceivable weight is below limitless, 100% means being capable or strong to be considered that strong....
·
Fifthchild
· Mon Feb 17, 2014 at 09:00:55 pm EST
Re: On a Scale of Potential or Limitless Strength, the numbers should be used as percentiles not tons....
·
Fifthchild
· Mon Feb 17, 2014 at 10:26:42 am EST
It used to be OK, but not in terms of actual tonnage...
· Braugi
· Mon Feb 17, 2014 at 09:25:52 am EST
It's a ridiculous system...
·
Would be Watcher
· Mon Feb 17, 2014 at 08:25:57 am EST
It's actually rather brilliant
·
Ragnarok
· Mon Feb 17, 2014 at 09:30:37 am EST
Re: It's actually rather brilliant
·
Would be Watcher
· Mon Feb 17, 2014 at 02:17:49 pm EST
Yes & No...and yes
·
Fifthchild
· Mon Feb 17, 2014 at 01:30:03 am EST
I've always liked using...
·
fearcalypse
· Sun Feb 16, 2014 at 04:21:25 pm EST
Re: I've always liked using...
·
JesusFan
· Mon Feb 17, 2014 at 10:07:41 am EST
Just don't limit yourself to 100 tons and just treat it as a scale, you should be fine.
(no text)
·
Thor_The_Mighty
· Sun Feb 16, 2014 at 04:03:20 pm EST
but 100 is a good place to stop counting
(no text)
·
Incriptus
· Sun Feb 16, 2014 at 02:03:52 pm EST
Re: Class 100, is it a poor way to rank strenght?
·
Toe Rag
· Sun Feb 16, 2014 at 12:46:17 pm EST
No Its Meaningless
· Volstagg jr
· Sun Feb 16, 2014 at 02:07:05 pm EST
I assume that if Class 100 doesn't mean 100 tons, then "Class 95" doesn't mean 95 tons...
·
The Real Lance Eason
· Sun Feb 16, 2014 at 11:38:44 pm EST
I've always liked the "Incalculable" rating for the mega-heavyweight strongmen...
(no text)
·
Sir PoetTree
· Sun Feb 16, 2014 at 12:21:06 pm EST
^This...
(no text)
·
fearcalypse
· Sun Feb 16, 2014 at 04:29:44 pm EST
^^No, this!
(no text)
·
Sir PoetTree
· Mon Feb 17, 2014 at 10:08:38 am EST
Re: Class 100, is it a poor way to rank strenght?
·
bd2999
· Sun Feb 16, 2014 at 12:00:13 pm EST
Considering how Thor and Hulk, casually toss about a hundred or so tons like nothing, I'd say so...
· THUNDERER!
· Sun Feb 16, 2014 at 10:02:53 am EST
Alvaro's Comicboards powered by On Topic™ © 2003-2022 Powermad Software
All the content of these boards Copyright © 1996-2022 by Comicboards/TVShowboards. Software Copyright © 2003-2022
Powermad Software