|The Flash >> View Post|
Subj: Do we really need 2 big bads for Flash Season 3?
Posted: Tue Jul 26, 2016 at 01:31:16 pm EDT (Viewed 524 times)
Because that looks like that is what is going to happen.
The Reverse Flash is the "possible" big bad villain for Flashpoint while Dr. Alchemy "could" be the possible big bad for the rest of the season.
The Reverse Flash being the big bad for the Flashpoint episode(s) makes sense because he was the big bad in the comic. Still, that is essentially repeating the same villain for 3 seasons now. *Sigh*
Speaking for myself, I'd rather have the Mirror Master as the big bad for season 3 since we were promised that we'd see him for 2 seasons now but never did.
Regardless if it's Dr. Alchemy or the Mirror Master, I'm just glad it's not going to be yet another Speedster (that is, if I forget about the Reverse Flash).
What do you think of Dr. Alchemy being the season 3 big bad once Flashpoint is over?
It's interesting that a hero/villain performs one amazing feat, or use a power they haven't used for 20+ years, and that automatically propels them to a high status despite scans and evidence to the contrary. I don't know what is worse, selective feat picking that has only been done once or twice 20, or more, years ago or ignoring evidence from scans or the lack thereof. We need to stop putting our favorite heroes/villains on pedestals and start putting them where they really belong. But it's evident that people never will because they would rather accuse others of cherry picking feats, when they don't, and being 'morally superior' when they aren't. I guess being honest and as fair as possible only opens one up to being the target of childish accusations and fault finding by those who insist on acting petty and childish. What happened to a good debate between two civil, mature, adults?
Posted with Mozilla 11.0 on Windows 7
|Alvaro's Comicboards powered by On Topic™ © 2003-2022 Powermad Software|