Marvel Universe >> View Thread

Author
mjyoung





Posted with Mozilla Firefox 3.0.10 on Windows XP
Jase





Posted with Mozilla Firefox 3.0.10 on Windows XP
Nitz the Bloody





Posted with Apple Safari 4.0 on MacOS X
Jase





Posted with Mozilla Firefox 3.0.10 on Windows XP
autochron





Posted with Mozilla Firefox 3.0.10 on Windows Vista
FirstChAoS





Posted with Microsoft Internet Explorer 7 on Windows XP
Nitz the Bloody





Posted with Apple Safari 4.0 on MacOS X
Jase





Posted with Mozilla Firefox 3.0.10 on Windows XP
Jase





Posted with Mozilla Firefox 3.0.10 on Windows XP
Punchdrunk





Posted with Mozilla Firefox 3.0.10 on Windows XP
mjyoung





Posted with Mozilla Firefox 3.0.10 on Windows XP
Nitz the Bloody





Posted with Apple Safari 4.0 on MacOS X
jay





    Quote:
    Schedule right now is:



    Quote:
    2010 Iron Man II
    2011 Thor, Captain America
    2012 Avengers, plus one secret movie


That's disappointing. They're focusing on making a tiny number of incredibly expensive "tentpole" features, instead of diversifying into a larger number of good smaller films. Marvel's properties are vast. Things like Power Man & Iron Fist and the Man Thing could be brought to the screen in spectacular fashion very inexpensively. I thought the Ant Man feature was a great idea. "Tentpole" features centered around spectacle become such big money risks that they develop Bigger, Dumber, Louder Syndrome, unless guided by the hand of a filmmaker with enough pull to get his way, which doesn't often happen.

---
"The Dig"
http://cinemarchaeologist.blogspot.com/


Posted with Mozilla Firefox 2.0.0.20 on Windows 98
Jase





Posted with Mozilla Firefox 3.0.10 on Windows XP
mjyoung





    Quote:

      Quote:
      Schedule right now is:

      Quote:

        Quote:
        2010 Iron Man II
        2011 Thor, Captain America
        2012 Avengers, plus one secret movie



    Quote:
    That's disappointing. They're focusing on making a tiny number of incredibly expensive "tentpole" features, instead of diversifying into a larger number of good smaller films. Marvel's properties are vast. Things like Power Man & Iron Fist and the Man Thing could be brought to the screen in spectacular fashion very inexpensively. I thought the Ant Man feature was a great idea. "Tentpole" features centered around spectacle become such big money risks that they develop Bigger, Dumber, Louder Syndrome, unless guided by the hand of a filmmaker with enough pull to get his way, which doesn't often happen.


Remember that Marvel is still in "debt" here, taking out a $500M dollar loan to finance these movies. There are also fixed costs for a movie, where certain things are going to cost the same no matter what movie it is.

So from that viewpoint, it makes sense to start off with the blockbuster movies. These movies are probably less risky, because you have a good chance of making back your money. Iron Man may cost twice as much as a Luke Cage movie, but it has the potential to make three times as much.

Something like Luke Cage might only cost $100M to make, but it might only make $150. Iron Man might cost $150M, but it can make $300M.

So I can understand it. Since Marvel has said that it's goal is to release 4 movies a year, some of those are going to be smaller films. You might get a horror/monster movie in October, a family comedy movie in Dec, a romantic movie in February, etc. And they will all be Marvel movies.


Posted with Mozilla Firefox 3.0.11 on Windows XP
Nitz the Bloody





Posted with Apple Safari 4.0 on MacOS X
Jase





Posted with Mozilla Firefox 3.0.11 on Windows XP
Reverend Meteor


Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008
Posts: 11,689





Posted with Mozilla Firefox 3.0.11 on Windows Vista
MysteryMan





Posted with Microsoft Internet Explorer 7 on Windows XP
bd2999





Posted with Microsoft Internet Explorer 6 on Windows XP

Alvaro's Comicboards powered by On Topic™ © 2003-2022 Powermad Software