| Author | |
killa4illa Member Since: Tue Jul 28, 2009 |
Subject: Miracleman Posted Sun Mar 28, 2021 at 01:28:48 am EDT (Viewed 187 times) |
|
| |
|
What ever happened to the new Miracleman stories? I was under the impression he would be rolled into Marvel continuity at some point and we would get new stories featuring the character. Did I get it wrong or have we been misled? Maybe the plans just got canceled?
Posted with Samsung Mobile 537.36 on Linux
| |
The Black Guardian Moderator Location: Paragon City, RI Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008 |
Subject: Re: Miracleman [Re: killa4illa] Posted Sun Mar 28, 2021 at 01:32:13 pm EDT (Viewed 188 times) |
|
| |
|
It was never, ever the plan to put him into the Marvel universe, just finish up Gaiman's story. Apparently, he's still working on it. City of Heroes is BACK!
Posted with Mozilla Firefox 87.0 on Windows 10
| |
Vee Member Since: Sun Nov 04, 2018 |
Subject: Re: Miracleman [Re: The Black Guardian] Posted Mon Mar 29, 2021 at 10:03:44 am EDT (Viewed 143 times) |
|
| |
|
Gaiman's been working on it for 7+ years now at least. You would think he'd have 10 or more issues under his belt by now even with his other projects. Marvel/Disney might be the real reason we haven't seen anything. They probably don't see the dollar potential, which is a pathetic shame if that's the case.
Posted with Google Chrome 84.0.4147.125 on Linux
| |
|
JesusFan Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008 |
Subject: Re: Miracleman [Re: Vee] Posted Tue Mar 30, 2021 at 11:38:29 am EDT (Viewed 151 times) |
|
| |
|
all we need is to have another Superman swannbe in Marvel, who is sick and perverted to boot!
Posted with Mozilla Firefox 87.0 on Linux
| |
|
JesusFan Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008 |
Subject: Re: Miracleman [Re: The Black Guardian] Posted Tue Mar 30, 2021 at 11:40:10 am EDT (Viewed 161 times) |
|
| |
|
Does Marvel really need another superman wannabe, in addition to Hyperion, Sentry, Neferia, Glads etc?
Posted with Mozilla Firefox 87.0 on Linux
| |
|
The Black Guardian Moderator Location: Paragon City, RI Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008 |
Subject: Re: Miracleman [Re: JesusFan] Posted Tue Mar 30, 2021 at 02:08:09 pm EDT (Viewed 152 times) |
|
| |
|
Indeed. IMO, nope... and I could very well do without those too. TBH, I don't think Miracleman works in any universe except his own. I don't really understand why any fan would want him to be part of Marvel. City of Heroes is BACK!
Posted with Mozilla Firefox 87.0 on Windows 10
| |
|
Vee Member Since: Sun Nov 04, 2018 |
Subject: Re: Miracleman [Re: JesusFan] Posted Tue Mar 30, 2021 at 05:57:07 pm EDT (Viewed 149 times) |
|
| |
|
Alan Moore's Miracleman run back in the 80's was one of the best on-going comic stories I ever read. Gaiman finished it up after around issue #17 I believe but he stuck with Moore's vision until the series ended somewhere in the low 20's.
Posted with Google Chrome 84.0.4147.125 on Linux
| |
Ed Love Location: North Carolina Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008 |
Subject: Re: Miracleman [Re: The Black Guardian] Posted Thu Apr 01, 2021 at 02:14:42 pm EDT (Viewed 157 times) |
|
| |
|
I'd say since the character is now owned by Marvel, divide them in two. Let Miracleman be his own thing and bring Marvel Man et al into the Marvel Universe as Marvel's version of the Shazam Marvel Family. Visit my Golden-Age Encyclopedias and web pages: http://www.herogoggles.com
Posted with Mozilla Firefox 87.0 on Windows 10
| |
|
killa4illa Member Since: Tue Jul 28, 2009 |
Subject: Re: Miracleman [Re: The Black Guardian] Posted Fri Apr 02, 2021 at 12:46:42 am EDT (Viewed 119 times) |
|
| |
|
Thanks for clarifying, I guess I dreamt up that part about him being introduced/retconned into the Marvel Universe. I can't believe Gaiman hasn't finished yet! I figured I had just missed the ending
Posted with Samsung Mobile 537.36 on Linux
| |
|
Grey Gargoyle Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008 |
Subject: BTW, the other Miracle Man is back from the dead & still around... [Re: killa4illa] Posted Wed Apr 21, 2021 at 05:35:01 am EDT (Viewed 110 times) |
|
| |
|
Posted with Mozilla Firefox 88.0 on Windows NT 4.0
|