The Superman Family Message Board >> View Thread

Author
Ranger




Just found this link at Supermanhomepage.com:

http://www.supermancinema.co.uk/superman3/general/script/s3_original_idea.pdf

After reading it, I can say this had potential to be a better film than the Superman III that ultimately came out in 1983, although there's a lot of work to be done.

What do you guys think?


Posted with Microsoft Internet Explorer 7 on Windows XP
Jokerisdaking




> Just found this link at Supermanhomepage.com:
>
> http://www.supermancinema.co.uk/superman3/general/script/s3_original_idea.pdf
>
> After reading it, I can say this had potential to be a better film than the Superman III that ultimately came out in 1983, although there's a lot of work to be done.
>
> What do you guys think?

That idea makes the version of Superman 3 we got read like Shakespeare.




Posted with Microsoft Internet Explorer 7 on Windows Vista
darth-sinister




> > Just found this link at Supermanhomepage.com:
> >
> > http://www.supermancinema.co.uk/superman3/general/script/s3_original_idea.pdf
> >
> > After reading it, I can say this had potential to be a better film than the Superman III that ultimately came out in 1983, although there's a lot of work to be done.
> >
> > What do you guys think?
>
> That idea makes the version of Superman 3 we got read like Shakespeare.
>
>

I perfer what we got. It at least matched up to the first two films, even despite the comedy.


Posted with Microsoft Internet Explorer 6 on Windows XP
Jon Clark




> Just found this link at Supermanhomepage.com:
>
> http://www.supermancinema.co.uk/superman3/general/script/s3_original_idea.pdf
>
> After reading it, I can say this had potential to be a better film than the Superman III that ultimately came out in 1983, although there's a lot of work to be done.
>
> What do you guys think

It's a rough draft so it could have gotten better in later rewrites- but based on what is there this would have torpedoed the franchise faster than the version of Superman IV actually did. It would have lost the comic fans by playing fast and loose with Supergirl and Brainiac. It would have lost everyone else with the bloated storyline (Time travel, Myxzptlk, Supergirl's whole origin...)


Posted with Microsoft Internet Explorer 7 on Windows Vista
Ant




Incest?????????????????????????????????

> > > Just found this link at Supermanhomepage.com:
> > >
> > > http://www.supermancinema.co.uk/superman3/general/script/s3_original_idea.pdf
> > >
> > > After reading it, I can say this had potential to be a better film than the Superman III that ultimately came out in 1983, although there's a lot of work to be done.
> > >
> > > What do you guys think?
> >
> > That idea makes the version of Superman 3 we got read like Shakespeare.
> >
> >
>
> I perfer what we got. It at least matched up to the first two films, even despite the comedy.


Posted with Microsoft Internet Explorer 7 on Windows Vista
darth-sinister




> Incest?????????????????????????????????

Read it again. Superman and Supergirl are both Kryptonian, but they are not related.


Posted with Microsoft Internet Explorer 6 on Windows XP
Braugi




it just wasn't a Superman movie. It was a Richard Pryor movie, in the tradition of the Toy, Brewsters Millions, and See No Evil/Hear No Evil. Taken in that context, as a Richard Pryor movie with Superman in a backup role, its actually not too bad of a comedy.

As far as the script below, it plays too fast and loose with the comic continuity IMO, though I like the inclusion of Brainiac.

In fact, I had some lengthy conversations with some friends of mine...we were pretty disappointed with Superman Returns, and I feel that Brainiac or Eradicator or some amalgamation of the two would have made an excellent villain...if you wanted to tie in the previous continuity, I would have had Lex be a critical aid in the defeat of the kryptonian threat....you could have planned for a trilogy of movies...Superman Returns, the Death of Superman, and the Return of Superman, with lots of interesting things going on in the background of Superman Returns...like full pardon for Lex, Superman proposal to Lois, etc...build things over 2-3 movies...

SR wasn't HORRIBLE, but it was dissappointing...I have even more criticism for the Hulk movie...

> Just found this link at Supermanhomepage.com:
>
> http://www.supermancinema.co.uk/superman3/general/script/s3_original_idea.pdf
>
> After reading it, I can say this had potential to be a better film than the Superman III that ultimately came out in 1983, although there's a lot of work to be done.
>
> What do you guys think?


Posted with Microsoft Internet Explorer 6 on Windows XP
omike015




> it just wasn't a Superman movie. It was a Richard Pryor movie, in the tradition of the Toy, Brewsters Millions, and See No Evil/Hear No Evil.

...which is exactly why it's considered the worst of the Reeve movies.

>Taken in that context, as a Richard Pryor movie with Superman in a backup role, its actually not too bad of a comedy.

That's not what they were trying to make, though. It was Superman III, not "The Wacky Adventures of Richard Pryor and Kid Krypton."

omike015
:-|



kandor.monkeylord.net (10.0.1.245)
using Fortress Kryptonian Browsing Matrix v1.9.38 (0.3 points)
RAB




"The Wacky Adventures of Richard Pryor and Kid Krypton."

Please, please... this needs a banner.

Ryan Brandt
---
Writer of Ideas
Creator of Stuff

My Amazers Forum!


Posted with Mozilla Firefox 2.0.0.10 on Windows XP

Alvaro's Comicboards powered by On Topic™ © 2003-2022 Powermad Software