|Avengers >> View Post|
Subj: Maybe, Kang = Tony Stark?
Posted: Tue May 01, 2007 at 11:17:38 am EDT
Reply Subj: Re: But then...
Posted: Tue May 01, 2007 at 10:54:13 am EDT
> > > > > I posted this at Avengers Forever, and created a great thread. I
> > > > > thought some of you might get a kick out of it also....
> > > > >
> > > > > ...wait to see how it all plays out.
> > > >
> > > > What of the fact that Kang is Immortus is a descendant of Nathaniel
> > > > Richards?
> > >
> > > Kang and Immortus are no longer the same person. It's unclear if
> > > either of them are a part of Nathaniel Richards's bloodline anymore,
> > > as well.
> > >
> > > Read Avengers Forever, if you haven't already. It's a really
> > > well-done (if very continuity-heavy) "cosmic" style Avengers tale.
> > I've read Avengers Forever. Seemed quite clear they were still the same person, just separate beings.
> I got the same conclusion also. Plus the Forever Crystal, which was used to split Kang and Immortus was used to split Human Torch and Vision as well, making them both originate from the same android. I remember also from the What If Timequake arc that Kang may be related to Reed Richards. But it still may be possible that Tony is being controlled by Kang or Immortus (he was even given technology from them during the Force Works series) . Since the objective of the Avengers Forever was to keep the Avengers from going and taking over space, they used Tony to sabotage the Avengers. Now with the team split it would be a great way for the team to stay on earth. While I like the idea I think I dont think Tony will become Kang. But may be Kang like, like one of the impostors in the Kang Council.
Revealed evidence shows that this is currently not likely buuuut there's always the dreaded Retcon. Or maybe Kang just replaced Tony at some point in history? Fans would love that.
Posted with Microsoft Internet Explorer 6 on Windows XP
|Alvaro's Comicboards powered by On Topic™ © 2003-2022 Powermad Software|