Avengers >> View Post
·
Post By
BlakGard

In Reply To
stupid baby

Subj: Re: Exiles, ironman, and Civil War
Posted: Wed May 02, 2007 at 04:09:09 am EDT
Reply Subj: Re: Exiles, ironman, and Civil War
Posted: Tue May 01, 2007 at 11:11:58 pm EDT

Previous Post

> > I don´t think so.
> >
> > Iron Man is trying to AVOID an arms race. Civil War was about CONTAINMENT, not escalation. In fact, the man has been about disarmement for years now. He is all-too-aware of the power of the armor he himself wears, and of the destruction just one person with too much power could cause. That is also what the Initiative is for: checks and balances. One person with the power of a god would mean the end of the world. TWO people with such power, however... might not.
> > Tony might create a police state, but he would not start a war. He went one-on-one with King Thor to stop a war, for pete´s sakes.
> >
> > On a different note: as massive as the Hulkbuster-like armor of Weapon-X-Iron Man was, that Tony Stark was a scrawny little guy. Our Tony is fairly buff.
>
> True but i'm saying he might be pushed to that extreme i it ment putting down the hulk. Because none of us can predict what will happen by the end of WWH. Tony very well could be pushed to that extreme in a moment of utterdesperation. Ya know kill thousands to save billions.
>
> Another note the fate of the weapon x tony is longshot took out one of his eyes and they sent him back without his armor to be put to death.
>
> Also in a recent exiles issue they showed another world very similar to 616 in this world stark was ironman and the oresident but he was assassinated by hydra and the hand. I think its very possible that stark might become president. and even tho i hate stark hes still be better then bush \:P

stark and bush?
unfortunalty, I dont see much of a difference between either of those guys..

> > > I don´t think so.
> > >
> > > Iron Man is trying to AVOID an arms race. Civil War was about CONTAINMENT, not escalation. In fact, the man has been about disarmement for years now. He is all-too-aware of the power of the armor he himself wears, and of the destruction just one person with too much power could cause. That is also what the Initiative is for: checks and balances. One person with the power of a god would mean the end of the world. TWO people with such power, however... might not.
> > > Tony might create a police state, but he would not start a war. He went one-on-one with King Thor to stop a war, for pete´s sakes.
> > >
> > > On a different note: as massive as the Hulkbuster-like armor of Weapon-X-Iron Man was, that Tony Stark was a scrawny little guy. Our Tony is fairly buff.
> >
> > True but i'm saying he might be pushed to that extreme i it ment putting down the hulk. Because none of us can predict what will happen by the end of WWH. Tony very well could be pushed to that extreme in a moment of utterdesperation. Ya know kill thousands to save billions.
> >
> > Another note the fate of the weapon x tony is longshot took out one of his eyes and they sent him back without his armor to be put to death.
> >
> > Also in a recent exiles issue they showed another world very similar to 616 in this world stark was ironman and the oresident but he was assassinated by hydra and the hand. I think its very possible that stark might become president. and even tho i hate stark hes still be better then bush \:P
>
> stark and bush?
> unfortunalty, I dont see much of a difference between either of those guys..

Eh... Stark is smarter (not saying much), and Stark does have better intentions.
____________________



Posted with Netscape Navigator 8.1.3 on Windows XP
Alvaro's Comicboards powered by On Topic™ © 2003-2022 Powermad Software
All the content of these boards Copyright © 1996-2022 by Comicboards/TVShowboards. Software Copyright © 2003-2022 Powermad Software