Avengers >> View Post
·
Post By
BlakGard

In Reply To
Sandman

Subj: Re: Who CAN'T you trust? And why? [NEW AVENGERS 31 SPOILERS]
Posted: Sat Jun 16, 2007 at 02:12:53 am EDT
Reply Subj: Re: Who CAN'T you trust? And why? [NEW AVENGERS 31 SPOILERS]
Posted: Fri Jun 15, 2007 at 09:07:05 pm EDT

Previous Post

> > Alright, so it's Skrulls... so lets assume they've infested
> > themselves in key places, where might they be?
> >
> > I'm sure the X-Men will be involved in some way, but none of Whedon's
> > team will be a Skrull and I doubt the New X-Men would have one, but
> > it's possible.
>
> Honestly, I'd prefer it if they didn't involve the X-Men in this. They've been through (and are going through) enough. Also, Whedon doesn't have a team anymore (unless you count the Runaways, who already have a Skrull). By the time this story even gears up, his run will be a distant memory (for those who even choose to remember it).
>
> > I don't think any of the ongoing solo heroes have been replaced..
> > they did that with Wolverine a few years back and it cheapened the
> > stories (it also meant every issue by Larsen did not technically have
> > Wolverine in it).
>
> Frankly, I'd kiss JoeyQ's stanky feet if they said Wolverine has been a Skrull since at least the last Skrullverine. Everything he's done since has been utter crap.
>
> > It's not Maria Sharpe because, well, that would change the meaning of
> > Civil War, wouldn't it?
>
> You mean Miriam Sharpe, and no, I don't think it would necessarily change the meaning of Civil War. Bendis dropped the line about Extremis maybe being started by the Skrull, which would make all of Tony's actions since suspect. Regardless of whether or not that turns out to be true, Miriam Sharpe's no different. I really doubt they will make Tony a Skrull, but I can see him being manipulated by Skrulls.
>
> > Also, don't assume that just because we've seen internal monologue it
> > isn't a Skrull. On multiple occassions the Skrulls have brainwashed
> > their own operatives.
>
> True, even if it is just making excuses for bad writing. I'd really hope they not use such tripe in this story.
>
> > I doubt any of the Thunderbolts have been replaced.
>
> I don't think we can rule them out. Penance could very well be a Skrull. Oddly survived Stamford. Acting abnormally. Hmm... how Skrully.
> ____________________
>
>

I don't think Penance will be a Skrull. Why would a Skrull be so sorrowful for killing innocent earthlings enough to cause himself constant pain? I'd say Norman Osborn due to the "patches" that have suddenly kept his sanity in check.

> > > I doubt any of the Thunderbolts have been replaced.
> >
> > I don't think we can rule them out. Penance could very well be a
> > Skrull. Oddly survived Stamford. Acting abnormally. Hmm... how
> > Skrully.
>
> I don't think Penance will be a Skrull. Why would a Skrull be so
> sorrowful for killing innocent earthlings enough to cause himself
> constant pain? I'd say Norman Osborn due to the "patches" that have
> suddenly kept his sanity in check.

How do we really know he's sorrowful or causing himself constant pain?
How do we really know Stamford was populated by humans?

If we're being lied to, then how do we know where the lie begins or ends?
____________________




Posted with Netscape Navigator 8.1.3 on Windows XP
Alvaro's Comicboards powered by On Topic™ © 2003-2022 Powermad Software
All the content of these boards Copyright © 1996-2022 by Comicboards/TVShowboards. Software Copyright © 2003-2022 Powermad Software