Avengers >> View Post
·
Post By
dave

In Reply To
Redhulk

Subj: Re: Many people have wanted to get taken up the Avengers tower
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 at 09:48:48 pm CST
Reply Subj: Many people have wanted to get taken up the Avengers tower
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 at 06:41:25 pm CST

Previous Post

>

> Are there any other gay characters in the Marvel U besides Wiccan, Hulkling, Northstar, Anole, and Karma? I think they need to be represented more. Your thoughts?
>
> I think that they don't need to be represented more unless they bring a new or different perspective; Gay for its own sake doesn't contribute. In many instances we have no idea of a character's religion or sexual preference, because for the vast majority of those characters who the characters really are is irrelevant to their role in the story.
>
> In the case of Wiccan and Hulkling, its integral to the characters' dynamic and to the team dynamic.


Yup totally agree, i know comics have to relate to people and almost make tokenism part of its entire philosophy, yet a smattering of it is fine just if you try to hard to represent every minority you soon make it look NOTHING like real life if the intention was infact to balance it out.

Most comics deal with these subjects in very good and non direct ways.

You can read the xmen and think of it as a racial statement about black suppression and yet you don't need any of the characters to be ethnic unless it really makes sense,

Personally i like that better, if you made the xmen a totally black group then unfortunately they could easily be steered into being ONLY about that issue....Zzzzzz

Yet if you keep them as they are i feel it can create a mental meme that may wake up a few more conservative and white people from their sleeps by putting them in situations they have never felt (as they are relating with the character)

So you put a gay team in the world and yes a lot of people would relate yet the majority would probably be turned off so any stories or points you want to make with the gay team would be lost, You put a redneck hetro team in gay situations

(no, not like having to plan a wedding, but situations that REALLY are serious such as having to face prejudice, violence, rejection)

And you soon get the point across about what it FEELS like to be in those situations and then they can relate more...

Having Avengers comprised of Cap Gay, Hydrocephalus Kid, Rd Dyslexic, Irritable old facist man, and auntie kleptomanicalbulimic may indeed represent the real world yet starts to become a mardi gras spectacular of crassness and repulsivness that any point is lost.

So sure all means have gay characters but dont force it....*honestly no pun intended





>
>

> >
>
> > Are there any other gay characters in the Marvel U besides Wiccan, Hulkling, Northstar, Anole, and Karma? I think they need to be represented more. Your thoughts?
> >
> > I think that they don't need to be represented more unless they bring a new or different perspective; Gay for its own sake doesn't contribute. In many instances we have no idea of a character's religion or sexual preference, because for the vast majority of those characters who the characters really are is irrelevant to their role in the story.
> >

To be fair, it's also hard to have gay characters that don't come off as being gay for the sake of being gay. Unless a gay character is taking a prominent role, the writers have to be more then subtle. Otherwise, a lot of people just wouldn't catch on.

> > In the case of Wiccan and Hulkling, its integral to the characters' dynamic and to the team dynamic.
>
>
> Yup totally agree, i know comics have to relate to people and almost make tokenism part of its entire philosophy, yet a smattering of it is fine just if you try to hard to represent every minority you soon make it look NOTHING like real life if the intention was infact to balance it out.
>

I agree but all minorities are greatly under shown. Women make up half of our population but are probably about 1/10 of the super heroes/villains at best. Ethnic groups are vastly underrepresented. Gay characters, although I don't know what the size of the gay population is in the US (depending on who you talk to it's anywhere form .5% to 10%) but there are very few of them when you look at the total number of character Marvel has cranked out since 1962.

Basically, I don't think we're even close to the point where we can complain about having too many of any minority group.

> Most comics deal with these subjects in very good and non direct ways.
>
> You can read the xmen and think of it as a racial statement about black suppression and yet you don't need any of the characters to be ethnic unless it really makes sense,
>

The Xmen hasn't been about that in a very long time, to my displeasure. They've been about meaningless powerups and space adventures for as long as I can remember.

> Personally i like that better, if you made the xmen a totally black group then unfortunately they could easily be steered into being ONLY about that issue....Zzzzzz
>

Well it wouldn't be an analogy if it was the actual issue.

> Yet if you keep them as they are i feel it can create a mental meme that may wake up a few more conservative and white people from their sleeps by putting them in situations they have never felt (as they are relating with the character)
>

I think (and this is what you are getting at) that having racial injustice argued by a bunch of white teenagers (mutants) may have opened the doors to a lot of people who would not have otherwise listened. For example, Cyclops is a dude like me. Having him go through those issues might make it more relevant to me somehow.

> So you put a gay team in the world and yes a lot of people would relate yet the majority would probably be turned off so any stories or points you want to make with the gay team would be lost, You put a redneck hetro team in gay situations
>

I think we are in agreement but I also don't think anyone is suggesting an all gay team.

> (no, not like having to plan a wedding, but situations that REALLY are serious such as having to face prejudice, violence, rejection)
>
> And you soon get the point across about what it FEELS like to be in those situations and then they can relate more...
>

exactly, yep

> Having Avengers comprised of Cap Gay, Hydrocephalus Kid, Rd Dyslexic, Irritable old facist man, and auntie kleptomanicalbulimic may indeed represent the real world yet starts to become a mardi gras spectacular of crassness and repulsivness that any point is lost.
>

I don't think that has ever been the case.

> So sure all means have gay characters but dont force it....*honestly no pun intended
>


When has it ever been forced? I think it was handled very well in Young Avengers and (until recently) ok in Annihilation.


Posted with Microsoft Internet Explorer 7 on Windows XP
Alvaro's Comicboards powered by On Topic™ © 2003-2022 Powermad Software
All the content of these boards Copyright © 1996-2022 by Comicboards/TVShowboards. Software Copyright © 2003-2022 Powermad Software