Avengers - Re: What was good about Avengers #29?

Post By

Legion

In Reply To

Lonewolf36

Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008

Subj: Re: What was good about Avengers #29?
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 at 10:57:34 pm EDT (Viewed 27 times)

Reply Subj: Re: What was good about Avengers #29?
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 at 09:23:42 pm EDT (Viewed 471 times)

<< Prev

NewEmailPrintRSSIndex

There is 13 That i don't recognize maybe someone else can feel those in.

Row 1

01. Professor X

Row 2

02. Amal Faroukh/Shadow King
03. Gamesmaster
04. Mister Sinister
05. Overmind

Row 3

06. Presence
07.
08.
09. Legion
10. Bedlam
11. Cassandra Nova

Row 4

12.
13. Moondragon
14.
15.
16. Marvel Girl
17.
18. Oracle

Row 5

19.
20.
21. Sundragon
22.
23. Miss Sinister
24. Arthur Maddicks
25. Gateway

Row 6

26. Karma
27. Mastermind
28. Mimic
29. Danielle Moonstar
30. Mesmero
31. Mercy

Row 7

32.
33. Stepford Cuckoos
34.
35.
36. Agatha Harkness
37.

"Cap: While it is great that he finally addressed the telepathic angle to a (minimum) degree it was hard to believe that his goto telepath here would be non-Avenger, current-enemy Rachel. It appears that everyone really need not pay too close attention to the AvX Fight Mini as it promotes itself - 'cuz he doesn't consider Iron Man's anti-telepath arsenal used effectively against Emma. *sigh* Bad call, Steve."

slight mistake here as the go to telepath was Xavier
They then set out to tackle Rachel

Attachments
1.jpg (483 x 369)	2.jpg (465 x 273)	3.jpg (483 x 469)

Posted with Google Chrome 20.0.1132.47 on Windows 7

NewEmailPrintRSSIndex

What was good about Avengers #29? [Spoilers] · emerick man · Wed Aug 15, 2012 at 06:17:29 pm EDT
- Re: What was good about Avengers #29? [Spoilers] · AssemblyRequired · Thu Aug 16, 2012 at 02:07:53 pm EDT
  - Ironically..... [Spoilers] · Hank · Thu Aug 16, 2012 at 06:23:48 pm EDT
    - Re: Ironically..... [Spoilers] · AssemblyRequired · Thu Aug 16, 2012 at 08:28:35 pm EDT
      - Re: Ironically..... [Spoilers] · The Black Guardian · Fri Aug 17, 2012 at 08:48:23 am EDT
      - Re: Ironically..... [Spoilers] · Hank · Thu Aug 16, 2012 at 11:48:14 pm EDT
        
        Re: Ironically..... [Spoilers] · AssemblyRequired · Fri Aug 17, 2012 at 02:57:13 am EDT
        
        Re: Doombot sex? [Spoilers] · emerick man · Fri Aug 17, 2012 at 12:22:16 pm EDT
        
        Re: Doombot sex? [Spoilers] · AssemblyRequired · Fri Aug 17, 2012 at 07:16:05 pm EDT
        
        Re: Doombot sex? [Spoilers] · swmcbf · Sun Aug 19, 2012 at 04:23:28 pm EDT
        Re: Uh oh, look out Reed... [Spoilers] · emerick man · Fri Aug 17, 2012 at 09:19:28 pm EDT
        
        Hmm... Dark Disney Presents: H.E.R.B.I.E. the Love Bot. (no text) · The Black Guardian · Sat Aug 18, 2012 at 10:25:36 am EDT
        
        Doom sexbot..... and where has that pubescent kid Kristoff be lately? (no text) · Hank · Sat Aug 18, 2012 at 12:43:50 pm EDT
        
        Re: Doom sexbot..... and where has that pubescent kid Kristoff be lately? · The Black Guardian · Sun Aug 19, 2012 at 09:01:38 am EDT
- Re: What was good about Avengers #29? [Spoilers] · The Black Guardian · Thu Aug 16, 2012 at 11:55:35 am EDT
- Re: What was good about Avengers #29? [Spoilers] · Lonewolf36 · Wed Aug 15, 2012 at 09:23:42 pm EDT
  - Re: Good calls... [Spoilers] · emerick man · Thu Aug 16, 2012 at 01:18:46 pm EDT
    - Re: Good calls... [Spoilers] · Lonewolf36 · Thu Aug 16, 2012 at 11:16:06 pm EDT
  - Re: What was good about Avengers #29? [Spoilers] · Legion · Wed Aug 15, 2012 at 10:57:34 pm EDT