> > as for the x-men thing, i was referring to getting scott and emma together. always bugged me that he spent so much time building towards it and jumped ship the second it happened.
> >
>
> Because his run was over, as was his contract.
|
maybe so, but it always bugged me that he shook things up like that and bolted. he gets a lot of credit for putting them together, but he never wrote a single issue with them as a couple.
> > also, i just read an interview with D. Diddy (as i like to call him) over at newsarama, and it left me a little confused about batman's very near future. so (a) batman's not really going to be back until june? is this because of the delays in final crisis? seems like they had to throw together a bunch of one-shots to fill the publishing gap.
> >
> > why such bad planning? it's a shame. i hope this ends up making sense.
>
> No, it has nothing to do with the delays. This was the plan for quite some time. The idea is for the books to stop, then we have the mini-series and one-shots. Then the books resume post battle.
|
seems like a weird plan. i don't see how it won't cost them a ton of money. but i'll reserve judgment until june.
...but seriously, no batman until june??
