![]() |
|
![]() |
Batman >> View Post |
|
| ||||||
Reply Subj: Personally . . . Posted: Thu Dec 17, 2009 at 03:18:30 pm EST (Viewed 3 times) | |||||||
>Arrogant, untalented, unhinged, poorly-motivated, and generally >unliked by nearly *all* of the Bat-Clan (Hell, Barbara barely >acknowledged her existence for the most part). Steph was literally the only reason I ever read "Robin." The only 'fun' character in a book about a guy who was way too self-serious for his own good. I can't remember if it was Steph or Felicia "Black Cat" Hardy in Spider-Man, but the speech was something along the lines of "Dude, we swing around on rooftops and fight bad guys. Lighten up and have some fun." Given how utterly dark and depressing the Bat-titles have been since Knightfall, Steph was a needed dose of levity in the Bat-Books. >After all, when was the last time Jason started a Gang War just to >prove that she "has what it takes"? (see "War Games") That's more the failure of the Bat Editors to tell Bill Willingham: "No Bill, actually all that sounds like a horrible idea. Who the hell wants to read Batman titles where a third-rate villian like Black Mask is the title's big bad?" >Most of the audience sentiment seems to have gone against Cassandra >Cain, which confuses me: Here was a character who was properly >motivated (she had been trained to kill, and was fighting to redeem >herself from that) as well as adequately trained (trained by Daddy >Super-Assassin to be a super-assassin); Being "well trained" does not equal being "well written" or "well drawn." Look at the below sales figures for Steph's first issue in comparison to the same month for Cassie from 2004 and 2005. An 11,000 difference five years ago and 23,000 difference from four years ago. Most comic fans don't want to read about a semi-mute, unemotional Batgirl. They'd rather read about a vibrant and wisecracking Batgirl. 39 - BATGIRL 08/2004: Batgirl #55 — 39,469 [43,494] 08/2005: Batgirl #67 — 28,159 08/2009: Batgirl #1 — 51,724 (+149.3%) >A weak character, no matter how you dress them or how much you try to >apologize for them, is a weak character, and Stephanie Brown, whether >she's Spoiler, Robin, or Batgirl, is, at her core, a Weak Character. Then I'm really not sure how on Earth Deadpool and Punisher have been around as long as they have. Both are pretty "weak" characters when you break them down. >Weak characters, while novel at first, cannot last long as Primary >Characters; especially if they're a Primary Character who happens to >have a history of being integral to their prospective mythos I don't think Cassie has ever been viewed as a Primary Character or as being integral to the mythos. Half the time it seemed the Bat Writers were trying to shoehorn her into the plot. Hell, Sasha Bordeaux during her time as Bruce's bodyguard was a more well-developed and well-written character. >Cassandra Cain was an excellent character, and slid into the Bat-Clan >like she'd always been there: She was used, abused, and tossed-aside >for the next model. She fit in as well as Aunt Harriet and Harold the Hunchback ever did. >Or maybe the question should be, how *long* does Stephanie Brown have? Steph's been a veteran of the Bat Family since 1992. Given the fact she's now outselling "Red Robin," she'll probably be around longer than Tim's current title. >The Chosen One has spoken. Heed and obey. Or roll your eyes in bemusement. | |||||||
Posted with Microsoft Internet Explorer 8 4.0; on Windows XP
| |||||||
|
Alvaro's Comicboards powered by On Topic™ © 2003-2022 Powermad Software |