Comic Battle >> View Post
·
Post By
Jaysin1414

In Reply To
Maestro

Subj: Re: OK, we just see this completely differently...
Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2007 at 11:34:46 pm EDT
Reply Subj: Re: OK, we just see this completely differently...
Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2007 at 06:58:59 pm EDT

Previous Post

> Even though the author of the Iron Man entry said that the HB wasn't the most powerful, you continue to point to the handbook...
>

Ok... wrong choice of words... physically strongest then. There, happy ? \:\-\)

> Even though the Extremis Iron Man armor is shown reacting in ten thousandths of a second, and NONE of the Buster suits operate at anything close to that speed, you continue to say they do...
>

No offense \:\-\) but here it is you are making me sound unreasonable (as in, I'm constantly pushing a point even though I'm clearly wrong), yet you have not chosen to respond to my proving that Extremis operates along the same principles as the HB has been shown to operate as well... rocket propelled movements. You can gloss over that part but this fact has hurt your argument quite a bit since rocket propelled movements logically will be much faster than that of a regular Armor's movements.

> Even though Tony is still putting the armor (which is in pieces) together in Avengers: Initiative #4, you continue to say it was done...
>

Again... what proof do you have that it was unfinished ?
The fact that he putting it together just prior to facing the Hulk automatically means that he still had more work to do ?
I didn't see any panels hanging off when Tony flew in to face the Hulk. \:\-P

> ...it's pointless to continue. Neither of us is going to convince the other of anything, so at this point I bid you adieu and wish you a good rest of your day.

Well you're right, I'll leave off this debate for now. But as you'll see shortly, I'm not quite done with IM yet. >:-D
>
> We'll chat again soon, different day, different argument...but this horse is dead. I think you're wronger than you've ever been...but that's cool. I'm sure you feel the same way \:D
>
> Have a good one, bud. \:\)

Yeah you too. \:\-\)

> > Even though the author of the Iron Man entry said that the HB wasn't the most powerful, you continue to point to the handbook...
> >
>
> Ok... wrong choice of words... physically strongest then. There, happy ? \:\-\)
>
Happier, yes. Thank you.
> > Even though the Extremis Iron Man armor is shown reacting in ten thousandths of a second, and NONE of the Buster suits operate at anything close to that speed, you continue to say they do...
> >
>
> No offense \:\-\) but here it is you are making me sound unreasonable (as in, I'm constantly pushing a point even though I'm clearly wrong), yet you have not chosen to respond to my proving that Extremis operates along the same principles as the HB has been shown to operate as well... rocket propelled movements. You can gloss over that part but this fact has hurt your argument quite a bit since rocket propelled movements logically will be much faster than that of a regular Armor's movements.
>
The scan you've posted backs your argument that the Extremis armor MIGHT have rocket assistance (though the supersonic punch back in IM #7 has no such artwork, though it's by the same artist). Could be that it does, could be that it doesn't. The FACT remains that the Extremis armor has shown reaction speed and reflexes that no other armor has. You can try to argue it but the FACTS are indisputable. Spider-man is 40 times faster than a normal man (according to the handbooks)...Iron Man dodged ALL of Spider-Man's punches in IM #15 (I think that's the number, could be wrong.) E-IM IS faster than the argonauts, faster than the Busters. DaveyM posted a fantastic analysis that hits it right on the head. If the Buster suit was as good as you are saying it's supposed to be, he'd only wear that one. The fact remains that he OPTS for the slimline armor for a reason...it's more versatile, it's more adaptable and it's FASTER. It's the only armor that in the book was clearly stated that was designed to work directly with his Extremis powers. You can theorize that he's updated all armors to have updated interfaces...but there's no proof that they do. I can theorize that the Hulk likes to dress up as Lindsay Lohan and go out partying all night long, but there's no proof that he does. I can't prove that IM didn't retrofit all of his prior armors, but I shouldn't have to prove a negative...the proof on the written page remains that only Extremis has the interface required for super-speed and reflexes.

> > Even though Tony is still putting the armor (which is in pieces) together in Avengers: Initiative #4, you continue to say it was done...
> >
>
> Again... what proof do you have that it was unfinished ?
> The fact that he putting it together just prior to facing the Hulk automatically means that he still had more work to do ?
> I didn't see any panels hanging off when Tony flew in to face the Hulk. \:\-P
>
Yes. I think that's pretty convincing evidence that if he's working on it. We have the circumstantial evidence as follows:

1) Project Achilles is still in testing when IM and She-Hulk fight. (She-Hulk #18)
2) We agree that Tony says "...I'd have more time. But I know better than anyone that things rarely turn out the way you hope." "So you do the best you can with what you have..in whatever time you have..." (Iron Man #19)
3) Rhodey hands Tony the sabotaged injector while Tony has the HB armor in a clearly undone stage. The fight occured VERY shortly after this panel, no more than at most a couple of hours.
4) While the Hulk is much faster than one would assume he could move, SpeedFreak has shown us that he's NOT supersonic tactically. One would surmise from comparing SpeedFreak and Spiderman, ahh forget that...Spiderman has avoided getting hit by the Hulk the VAST majority of the time. Iron Man has avoided getting hit by Spider-Man (by writers that acknowledge the Extremis upgrade at least). Thus, Iron Man, if wearing Extremis capable armor, would have avoided at least 1 of the Hulk's punches. He didn't. My analysis is that HB was no quicker than the HB of old. No quicker than TB of old.

> > ...it's pointless to continue. Neither of us is going to convince the other of anything, so at this point I bid you adieu and wish you a good rest of your day.
>
> Well you're right, I'll leave off this debate for now. But as you'll see shortly, I'm not quite done with IM yet. >:-D
> >
I would hope not...you bring a fun and feisty spirit to this debate, without being nasty as some posters have been. You strongly believe in your stance, but don't start name-calling when someone believes equally passionately that you are absolutely wrong. Which you are. \:D
> > We'll chat again soon, different day, different argument...but this horse is dead. I think you're wronger than you've ever been...but that's cool. I'm sure you feel the same way \:D
> >
> > Have a good one, bud. \:\)
>
> Yeah you too. \:\-\)


Posted with Microsoft Internet Explorer 7 on Windows XP
Alvaro's Comicboards powered by On Topic™ © 2003-2022 Powermad Software
All the content of these boards Copyright © 1996-2022 by Comicboards/TVShowboards. Software Copyright © 2003-2022 Powermad Software