Comic Battle >> View Post
·
Post By
Daveym

In Reply To
Fifthchild

Subj: Re: The way I understood Extremis to work is...
Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2007 at 07:52:02 am EDT
Reply Subj: Re: The way I understood Extremis to work is...
Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2007 at 07:33:04 am EDT

Previous Post

>
> > Theres no reason the same connection could not be extended to the Hulkbuster suit to enable it to respond just as fast. Hell I thought Extremis Iron Man could coopt and control any electrical device - it makes sense that the ease and speed of interface would be at least as good in anything that he actually built to be controlled by himself. Whats to slow him down - the extra few inches/feet for the signal to travel from Tony's brain to the CPU/limbs of the suit? Insignificant.
> > hh
> > hh
>
> I agree that Tony should be able to make the same connection. I think the argument hear is whether or not the physical armors are the same speed. It seems that the Hulkbuster armor is not as fast as the current standard suit.

My argument is that there is no physical/logical reason for it to be any slower. If it was depicted as slower than I think its just another case of "nobody writes IM like the Knaufs do" and Extremis would have been just as fast/slow in Pak's hands.
hh

>
> My argument is that there is no physical/logical reason for it to be any slower. If it was depicted as slower than I think its just another case of "nobody writes IM like the Knaufs do" and Extremis would have been just as fast/slow in Pak's hands.
> hh

There is no evidence whatsoever that that suit was fast in any sense of the word, absolutely none. It's just the wishful thinking of Hulkboosters, but just willing it to be that fast won't change any facts....

Do you not think that if that suit was as fast & mobile as you desperatly want it to be that Stark would be using it a lot more often? Would his standard armour not be a variation of that suit?
It was built for a very specific job, it is no competition or superior to his standard duds or he'd be wearing it as Standard would he not?

Boiling the argument down - the slimline Standard Armour weights about 10 kilos say, the Buster contraption weights somthing like half a tonne or more! Which is the more mobile and faster does common sense tell us?

You're arguing with only one leg and a bad limp with the other. But carry on It's amusing to watch \:\( |)


"LOL ...LMAO...*wink*... Guffaw... *sigh*..." (etc etc...)


Posted with Microsoft Internet Explorer 6 on Windows XP
Alvaro's Comicboards powered by On Topic™ © 2003-2022 Powermad Software
All the content of these boards Copyright © 1996-2022 by Comicboards/TVShowboards. Software Copyright © 2003-2022 Powermad Software