Comic Battle >> View Post
·
Post By
Fifthchild

In Reply To
Daveym

Subj: Re: Its tough to argue with someone....
Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2007 at 09:10:28 am EDT (Viewed 1 times)
Reply Subj: Re: The way I understood Extremis to work is...
Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2007 at 07:52:02 am EDT

Previous Post

>
> My argument is that there is no physical/logical reason for it to be any slower. If it was depicted as slower than I think its just another case of "nobody writes IM like the Knaufs do" and Extremis would have been just as fast/slow in Pak's hands.
> hh

There is no evidence whatsoever that that suit was fast in any sense of the word, absolutely none. It's just the wishful thinking of Hulkboosters, but just willing it to be that fast won't change any facts....

Do you not think that if that suit was as fast & mobile as you desperatly want it to be that Stark would be using it a lot more often? Would his standard armour not be a variation of that suit?
It was built for a very specific job, it is no competition or superior to his standard duds or he'd be wearing it as Standard would he not?

Boiling the argument down - the slimline Standard Armour weights about 10 kilos say, the Buster contraption weights somthing like half a tonne or more! Which is the more mobile and faster does common sense tell us?

You're arguing with only one leg and a bad limp with the other. But carry on It's amusing to watch \:\( |)


"LOL ...LMAO...*wink*... Guffaw... *sigh*..." (etc etc...)

> >
> > My argument is that there is no physical/logical reason for it to be any slower. If it was depicted as slower than I think its just another case of "nobody writes IM like the Knaufs do" and Extremis would have been just as fast/slow in Pak's hands.
> > hh
>

who chooses to avoid replying to all your arguments.

> There is no evidence whatsoever that that suit was fast in any sense of the word, absolutely none. It's just the wishful thinking of Hulkboosters, but just willing it to be that fast won't change any facts....

Wow. There is no evidence that it is slow. Theres no physical/logical reason to believe it would be slow. But I guess its not only not fast but "fast in any sense of the word, absolutely none". Hell I bet I could outrun it, dance circles around it cos I'm so comparatively small and therefore nimble, athletic and speedy? Yeah of course. Thats just common sense.

> Do you not think that if that suit was as fast & mobile as you desperatly want it to be that Stark would be using it a lot more often? Would his standard armour not be a variation of that suit?

Point addressed in above post.

> It was built for a very specific job, it is no competition or superior to his standard duds or he'd be wearing it as Standard would he not?
>
> Boiling the argument down - the slimline Standard Armour weights about 10 kilos say, the Buster contraption weights somthing like half a tonne or more! Which is the more mobile and faster does common sense tell us?

Jesus. You made the same argument once before. Ire futed it. You posted a nonsense reply. And now....you use the argument again. Nice.

> You're arguing with only one leg and a bad limp with the other. But carry on It's amusing to watch \:\( |)

At least I am arguing you are just making assertions. Have fun talking to yourself unless you can address any of my points.
hh

>
> "LOL ...LMAO...*wink*... Guffaw... *sigh*..." (etc etc...)


Posted with Mozilla Firefox 2.0.0.5 on Windows XP
Alvaro's Comicboards powered by On Topic™ © 2003-2022 Powermad Software
All the content of these boards Copyright © 1996-2022 by Comicboards/TVShowboards. Software Copyright © 2003-2022 Powermad Software