Comic Battle >> View Post
·
Post By
Daveym

In Reply To
Fifthchild

Subj: It is Indeed. Still No Evidence Then?
Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2007 at 12:53:20 pm EDT (Viewed 1 times)
Reply Subj: Re: Its tough to argue with someone....
Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2007 at 09:10:28 am EDT (Viewed 1 times)

Previous Post

> >
> > My argument is that there is no physical/logical reason for it to be any slower. If it was depicted as slower than I think its just another case of "nobody writes IM like the Knaufs do" and Extremis would have been just as fast/slow in Pak's hands.
> > hh
>

who chooses to avoid replying to all your arguments.

> There is no evidence whatsoever that that suit was fast in any sense of the word, absolutely none. It's just the wishful thinking of Hulkboosters, but just willing it to be that fast won't change any facts....

Wow. There is no evidence that it is slow. Theres no physical/logical reason to believe it would be slow. But I guess its not only not fast but "fast in any sense of the word, absolutely none". Hell I bet I could outrun it, dance circles around it cos I'm so comparatively small and therefore nimble, athletic and speedy? Yeah of course. Thats just common sense.

> Do you not think that if that suit was as fast & mobile as you desperatly want it to be that Stark would be using it a lot more often? Would his standard armour not be a variation of that suit?

Point addressed in above post.

> It was built for a very specific job, it is no competition or superior to his standard duds or he'd be wearing it as Standard would he not?
>
> Boiling the argument down - the slimline Standard Armour weights about 10 kilos say, the Buster contraption weights somthing like half a tonne or more! Which is the more mobile and faster does common sense tell us?

Jesus. You made the same argument once before. Ire futed it. You posted a nonsense reply. And now....you use the argument again. Nice.

> You're arguing with only one leg and a bad limp with the other. But carry on It's amusing to watch \:\( |)

At least I am arguing you are just making assertions. Have fun talking to yourself unless you can address any of my points.
hh

>
> "LOL ...LMAO...*wink*... Guffaw... *sigh*..." (etc etc...)

> > >
> > > My argument is that there is no physical/logical reason for it to be any slower. If it was depicted as slower than I think its just another case of "nobody writes IM like the Knaufs do" and Extremis would have been just as fast/slow in Pak's hands.
> > > hh
> >
>
> who chooses to avoid replying to all your arguments.
>
Wrong.

I answered all your points. You are apparently convinced the Buster suit has speed/reflexes equivalent to the normal suit yet you supply NO evidence to prove it because it simply does not exist! There's just your opinion and belief...

I spelled out the simple facts of how Iron Man works with regards Speciality suits, asked you why it is he would not use these suits or variations as standard if they were indeed comparable to his regular suit and you completley ignore the point...! Just Why ARE they termed speciality suits Hmm?
I then asked you if you 100% believe a half tonne hunk of cumbersome armour is as fast/agile/mobile as a regular 10 kilo suit and you avoid addressing the point...!
I ask you why Stark would feel the need to wear that suit? No answer. Just belief.

I don't even know that much about current IM, but i do know that that Buster suit was not a patch on his regular suit in terms of speed & mobility.

Good luck in the continued search for evidence it was indeed a match for his regular suit, you only have those few pages of WWH in which to sift & dissect... ;\-\)


"LOL ...LMAO...*wink*... Guffaw... *sigh*..." (etc etc...)


Posted with Microsoft Internet Explorer 6 on Windows XP
Alvaro's Comicboards powered by On Topic™ © 2003-2022 Powermad Software
All the content of these boards Copyright © 1996-2022 by Comicboards/TVShowboards. Software Copyright © 2003-2022 Powermad Software