 | fearcalypse 
INfinity and BEyond
Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008
Posts: 3,337
|
|
thorfan
|  |
|
Subj: I've always liked using...Posted: Sun Feb 16, 2014 at 03:21:25 pm CST (Viewed 106 times)
| Reply Subj: Class 100, is it a poor way to rank strenght?
Posted: Sun Feb 16, 2014 at 08:56:16 am CST (Viewed 40 times) |
|
|
|
| Previous Post
We've seen the hulk way above class 100 showings, im sure that others have showings high above that also(probably anyone who's ever held up a building) in your opinion is It a good way to rank strength? In other words why not class 500, class 1000?
|
this scale:
Normal human
Peak human
Enhanced
Super Strength
Vast Super Strength
Incalculable Strength
"James told me there's an old saying here on Earth: May you be in heaven half an hour before the devil knows you're dead.
Not sure if Turian heaven is the same as yours, but if this thing goes sideways and we both end up there, meet me at the bar."
Legion: "They will exterminate your species because their gods tell them to. You cannot negotiate with them. They do not share your pity, remorse, or fear."
|
Posted with Mozilla Firefox 27.0 on Windows 7
|
|
|
 Class 100, is it a poor way to rank strenght? · thorfan · Sun Feb 16, 2014 at 08:56:16 am CST
- The adjective rankings from the role playing game was much better. (no text) · Anima Spiritia · Mon Feb 17, 2014 at 09:00:59 am CST
- On a Scale of Potential or Limitless Strength, the numbers should be used as percentiles not tons.... · THUNDERER! · Mon Feb 17, 2014 at 08:52:57 am CST
- It used to be OK, but not in terms of actual tonnage... · Braugi · Mon Feb 17, 2014 at 08:25:52 am CST
- It's a ridiculous system... · Would be Watcher · Mon Feb 17, 2014 at 07:25:57 am CST
- Yes & No...and yes · Fifthchild · Mon Feb 17, 2014 at 12:30:03 am CST
- I've always liked using... · fearcalypse · Sun Feb 16, 2014 at 03:21:25 pm CST
- Just don't limit yourself to 100 tons and just treat it as a scale, you should be fine. (no text) · Thor_The_Mighty · Sun Feb 16, 2014 at 03:03:20 pm CST
- but 100 is a good place to stop counting (no text) · Incriptus · Sun Feb 16, 2014 at 01:03:52 pm CST
- Re: Class 100, is it a poor way to rank strenght? · Toe Rag · Sun Feb 16, 2014 at 11:46:17 am CST
- I've always liked the "Incalculable" rating for the mega-heavyweight strongmen... (no text) · Sir PoetTree · Sun Feb 16, 2014 at 11:21:06 am CST
- Re: Class 100, is it a poor way to rank strenght? · bd2999 · Sun Feb 16, 2014 at 11:00:13 am CST
- Considering how Thor and Hulk, casually toss about a hundred or so tons like nothing, I'd say so... · THUNDERER! · Sun Feb 16, 2014 at 09:02:53 am CST
|
All the content of these boards Copyright © 1996-2022 by Comicboards/TVShowboards. Software Copyright © 2003-2022 Powermad Software
