The Flash >> View Post
Post By

Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008
In Reply To

Location: Lancashire
Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008
Subj: Agreed
Posted: Mon Nov 30, 2015 at 07:56:07 pm GMT (Viewed 338 times)
Reply Subj: Re: Legends of Tomorrow may not get a second season.
Posted: Mon Nov 30, 2015 at 06:47:06 am GMT (Viewed 351 times)


    Possibly so, one additional problem is that the series has no clear format by which to promote and sell it, but to DC/Warner's favour they will at least get to introduce and try out these new characters as a test run to future outings.
    Given the success of The Flash, Arrow, Supergirl, I don't imagine the reception to this series will be a bad one, so as one more entry into their television expansion it will be a very worthwhile investment as it gets these characters out there and shows potential future producers what is possible with them. \(beret\)

That is indeed true. Rumor suggests that Ray Palmer AKA The Atom was getting his own solo series. If that rumor is true, it obviously didn't pan out. So, maybe Legends will be able to tell if his character will become popular enough to get his own solo series after Legends ends.

Then there is the highly popular Sara Lance character. I don't think a solo series is necessary but we could see one with her as the star.

Captain Cold and Heatwave, no way do they get a series. Don't see it. They are popular characters, true, but way do they get a series.

Hawkman and Hawkgirl: I can this becoming a series if these characters become popular enough.

This is all assuming any of these characters even survive in the run of Legends of Tomorrow. The writers/producers have said that some of these characters could die and if that's true, that could close off any potential future series about them.

Then again, none of these characters could get a solo series. We simply don't know, but the possibility is there.

If I had a vote, my vote goes to Ray Palmer AKA the Atom.

It's interesting that a hero/villain performs one amazing feat, or use a power they haven't used for 20+ years, and that automatically propels them to a high status despite scans and evidence to the contrary. I don't know what is worse, selective feat picking that has only been done once or twice 20, or more, years ago or ignoring evidence from scans or the lack thereof. We need to stop putting our favorite heroes/villains on pedestals and start putting them where they really belong. But it's evident that people never will because they would rather accuse others of cherry picking feats, when they don't, and being 'morally superior' when they aren't. I guess being honest and as fair as possible only opens one up to being the target of childish accusations and fault finding by those who insist on acting petty and childish. What happened to a good debate between two civil, mature, adults?
Posted with Mozilla 11.0 on Windows 7
Alvaro's Comicboards powered by On Topic™ © 2003-2022 Powermad Software
All the content of these boards Copyright © 1996-2022 by Comicboards/TVShowboards. Software Copyright © 2003-2022 Powermad Software