Marvel Universe >> View Post
·
Post By
DragynWulf

In Reply To
Attok12

Subj: Reading preview pages is not reading the issue. [SPOILERS]
Posted: Wed Sep 05, 2007 at 05:19:19 pm EDT
Reply Subj: Re: Responses To The Rhino Business [SPOILERS]
Posted: Wed Sep 05, 2007 at 09:15:26 am EDT

Previous Post

> > This is in regards to the responses below regarding the "I hate Rhino" thread (in case it drops off): Despite the fact that everyone ganged up on me and said otherwise, I did read the preview of the SHE-HULK #21 issue at the time I first saw it, and it didn't matter to me what was said in the dialogue. It didn’t matter that Slott wrote the Rhino scene to point out the things I’ve said about the use of the Rhino. The point of the thread was that I hated the Rhino.
> >
>
> The point of the thread was that you hated seeing the Rhino again, when it is NOT the Rhino. Had you actually read the issue you would find this out.

Once again, as I stated in the thread you just responded to, I did read the preview pages. Want me to prove it? Check out this thread:

http://www.comicboards.com/mub/view.php?rpl=070831191455

Apparently, everyone skipped this thread or refused to acknowledge it. Check the time/date it was posted. Near the same time as the original thread that started this all. It wasn't just added right now. Heck, I even gave Slott props.

>
> >So, Dragynwulf, my complaint was justified
>
> No it wasn't.

I say it was justified, and that's that, so we'll just have to agree to disagree about it.

>
> >because I was complaining about the Rhino being used yet again for the zillionth time -- it didn't matter what the Rhino was doing and saying in the issue....he was just there.

> >
>
> No he was not in the issue. Hence me using "Rhino" in quotes.

And, as stated before, I said I didn't care if it was the real Rhino or not. The character still looked like Rhino and that's all it takes. Seems to me we have another case of people ignoring half of what I wrote and only commenting on the parts one didn't like.

>
> >There was nothing in the original thread about how much I dislike Slott's work. There were no potshots. The thread was about how much I disliked the Rhino. That’s it.
> >
>
> It was complaining about Dan Slott's writing because you were complaining about the Rhino being used "again", when in FACT the Rhino was not used again. Had you taken the time to read the issue you would know exactly what the issue is about instead of jumping to a conclusion of the Rhino being in an issue when in fact he was not.

Once again, I guess I must repeat myself....cut....paste....

Once again, as I stated in the thread you just responded to, I did read the preview pages. Want me to prove it? Check out this thread:

http://www.comicboards.com/mub/view.php?rpl=070831191455

Apparently, everyone skipped this thread or refused to acknowledge it. Check the time/date it was posted. Near the same time as the original thread that started this all. It wasn't just added right now. Heck, I even gave Slott props.



>
> >It just so happened that he appeared in a Dan Slott-written book. Had the Rhino showed up in IRON MAN #22 or JIMMY CRACK CORN AND I DON’T CARE #45, I still would have complained.
> >
>
> And you still would not have read the issue either and still complained about an issue that you have not read at all. So what if a character you do not like appears in an issue you did not read or even buy. Had you bought the issue, then you could actually have something to complain about, but you didn't and the only time you wasted on the subject is you taking the time to go online and complain about something you didn't read, didn't buy and don't know what the story is about.

Ah, but then I have the right to complain about anything I want to, just like you and everyone else does. What's good for the goose is good for the gander. It's not a-okay for you and other people to complain about something and not for me. I've seen people rip into Bendis like crazy, and yet I've received worse reactions than those people did. Funny, isn't it?

> > > This is in regards to the responses below regarding the "I hate Rhino" thread (in case it drops off): Despite the fact that everyone ganged up on me and said otherwise, I did read the preview of the SHE-HULK #21 issue at the time I first saw it, and it didn't matter to me what was said in the dialogue. It didn’t matter that Slott wrote the Rhino scene to point out the things I’ve said about the use of the Rhino. The point of the thread was that I hated the Rhino.
> > >
> >
> > The point of the thread was that you hated seeing the Rhino again, when it is NOT the Rhino. Had you actually read the issue you would find this out.
>
> Once again, as I stated in the thread you just responded to, I did read the preview pages. Want me to prove it? Check out this thread:
>

I never said to "read the preview pages", I said "Read the issue". Large difference of what... 15-20 pages.

> Apparently, everyone skipped this thread or refused to acknowledge it. Check the time/date it was posted. Near the same time as the original thread that started this all. It wasn't just added right now. Heck, I even gave Slott props.
>
> >
> > >So, Dragynwulf, my complaint was justified
> >
> > No it wasn't.
>
> I say it was justified, and that's that, so we'll just have to agree to disagree about it.
>

Saying it is justified does not mean that it is indeed justified.

> > >because I was complaining about the Rhino being used yet again for the zillionth time -- it didn't matter what the Rhino was doing and saying in the issue....he was just there.
>
> > >
> >
> > No he was not in the issue. Hence me using "Rhino" in quotes.
>
> And, as stated before, I said I didn't care if it was the real Rhino or not. The character still looked like Rhino and that's all it takes. Seems to me we have another case of people ignoring half of what I wrote and only commenting on the parts one didn't like.
>

No I read what you said. You still complained that it was the Rhino and continue a rant about it. It is not the Rhino. If you are going to rant about something, then at least do it correctly. But read the issue also before you make that rant, because your rant is unjustified because you are ranting about nothing really, because what you are ranting about is not even in the issue.

> >
> > >There was nothing in the original thread about how much I dislike Slott's work. There were no potshots. The thread was about how much I disliked the Rhino. That’s it.
> > >
> >
> > It was complaining about Dan Slott's writing because you were complaining about the Rhino being used "again", when in FACT the Rhino was not used again. Had you taken the time to read the issue you would know exactly what the issue is about instead of jumping to a conclusion of the Rhino being in an issue when in fact he was not.
>
> Once again, I guess I must repeat myself....cut....paste....

READ THE ISSUE... what is confussing about that? I am not the only one to explain this to you. You just chose to act like we don't read what you say instead of getting to the point being made and that point is READ THE ISSUE. Not the previews, but the ISSUE.


Have a Nice Day!
-DragynWulf






Posted with Microsoft Internet Explorer 7 on Windows XP
Alvaro's Comicboards powered by On Topic™ © 2003-2022 Powermad Software
All the content of these boards Copyright © 1996-2022 by Comicboards/TVShowboards. Software Copyright © 2003-2022 Powermad Software