Marvel Universe >> View Post
·
Post By
entzauberung

In Reply To
Michael Hoskin

Subj: Question
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 at 12:16:27 pm EST (Viewed 3 times)
Reply Subj: Re: In What ways were the Original Handbooks Incorrect?
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 at 11:43:28 am EST (Viewed 2 times)

Previous Post

> > -Listing Dreadknight as a member of the Masters of Evil IV. This was apparently an interpretation of the shadowy figure who was almost recruited in Amazing Spider-Man #283. It was later revealed this was in fact a new character, Mongoose.
>
> I don't recall Dreadknight actually making the Handbook entry. I wonder if that means I have a second printing...

The error wasn't in the Masters of Evil entry - it was in Dreadknight's own.

MH

> > > -Listing Dreadknight as a member of the Masters of Evil IV. This was apparently an interpretation of the shadowy figure who was almost recruited in Amazing Spider-Man #283. It was later revealed this was in fact a new character, Mongoose.
> >
> > I don't recall Dreadknight actually making the Handbook entry. I wonder if that means I have a second printing...
>
> The error wasn't in the Masters of Evil entry - it was in Dreadknight's own.
>
> MH

Do you know why neither Bullseye nor Kraven was in the Deluxe Edition? Both was and still are fairly high-profile villains.




Posted with Microsoft Internet Explorer 6 on Windows XP
Alvaro's Comicboards powered by On Topic™ © 2003-2022 Powermad Software
All the content of these boards Copyright © 1996-2022 by Comicboards/TVShowboards. Software Copyright © 2003-2022 Powermad Software