Marvel Universe - Re: In Defense of Spitfire

Post By

mjyoung

In Reply To

David Medinnus

Subj: Re: In Defense of Spitfire
Posted: Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 03:03:34 pm EST (Viewed 95 times)

Reply Subj: Re: In Defense of Spitfire
Posted: Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 08:32:09 am EST (Viewed 83 times)

<< Prev

NewEmailPrintRSSIndex

Quote:

Excellent use of the Diamond sales figures - now to prove your point, compare the sales figures with the other House of M tie-ins, as your point was that it sold well for what it was.

Quote:

If it sold above the other tie-ins, it sold well; if it sold poorly relative to the other tie-ins, not so much. *grins*

Ok, the reason why I didn't include the other spinoffs is because I didn't know which ones you wanted to consider to be true spinoffs. A few relative series.

42     House Of M Avengers 1      $2.99     47,508
16     X-Men 198 1      $2.99     68,675
37     Silent War 1      $2.99     44,077
49     Sentinel Squad One 1      $2.99     34,976
29 Son Of M 1 $2.99 62,255
51     Captain Britain & M.I.13 1     $2.99     43,268

So seems like it's right under the X-Men miniseries, which I think is acceptable. Apparently there was much more interest in the Quicksilver miniseries then there was in the Captain Britain series with Spitfire.

The poster tried to claim that Son of M was a bad seller, and he was completely wrong. My position is to simply give the title the sales credit I thought it was due.

Posted with Mozilla Firefox 3.6.12 on Windows XP

NewEmailPrintRSSIndex

where should the charecters fro the INVADERS go next? · REED RICHARDS · Tue Nov 23, 2010 at 04:29:19 am EST
- Golden age Vision ... · Varan · Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 11:23:08 am EST
- Re: where should the charecters fro the INVADERS go next? · FirstChAoS · Sun Nov 28, 2010 at 11:35:54 pm EST
- To their own title!!! · The GoldenAger · Sat Nov 27, 2010 at 08:05:38 am EST
- As far as old Invaders foes go.... · Todd Arliss · Wed Nov 24, 2010 at 02:15:43 am EST
- they should go away · mjyoung · Tue Nov 23, 2010 at 04:16:40 pm EST
  - I don't agree at all! · REED RICHARDS · Wed Nov 24, 2010 at 06:33:37 am EST
    - Re: I don't agree at all! · mjyoung · Wed Nov 24, 2010 at 05:16:33 pm EST
      - well that's YOUR opinion · REED RICHARDS · Fri Nov 26, 2010 at 07:56:53 am EST
        
        Re: well that's YOUR opinion · mjyoung · Fri Nov 26, 2010 at 11:31:54 pm EST
        
        not realy · REED RICHARDS · Sat Nov 27, 2010 at 11:51:21 am EST
        
        Re: not realy · mjyoung · Sat Nov 27, 2010 at 05:43:21 pm EST
        
        In Defense of Spitfire · David Medinnus · Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 12:11:05 am EST
        
        Re: In Defense of Spitfire · mjyoung · Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 01:50:42 am EST
        
        so you agree with me!? · REED RICHARDS · Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 10:36:54 am EST
        
        Re: so you agree with me!? · mjyoung · Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 02:52:10 pm EST
        
        Re: In Defense of Spitfire · David Medinnus · Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 08:38:51 am EST
        
        Re: In Defense of Spitfire · The Black Guardian · Wed Dec 01, 2010 at 05:28:14 pm EST
        
        Re: In Defense of Spitfire · David Medinnus · Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 08:32:09 am EST
        
        Re: In Defense of Spitfire · mjyoung · Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 03:03:34 pm EST
- V-battalion · Oldman · Tue Nov 23, 2010 at 01:35:34 pm EST