Marvel Universe >> View Post
·
Post By
Knight

Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008
In Reply To
America's Captain 
Maintainer

Location: Bayville New Jersey
Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008
Posts: 12,139
Subj: Re: from Newsarama: Which ELSE could Joss Whedon bring to TV from Marvel?
Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 at 12:44:05 pm EDT (Viewed 131 times)
Reply Subj: from Newsarama: Which ELSE could Joss Whedon bring to TV from Marvel?
Posted: Sun May 12, 2013 at 09:28:32 am EDT (Viewed 221 times)






    Quote:
    I personally think these ideas have merit:



    Quote:
    Doctor Strange



    Quote:
    Heroes for Hire


I could see this happening.


    Quote:
    Avengers Academy


I'd watch it.


    Quote:
    S.W.O.R.D.


Too similar to S.H.I.E.L.D. Wouldn't work.


    Quote:

    I also think they left out a major possibility, one which Newsarama has noted before, just not in this article:



    Quote:
    Daredevil


Personally, I'd rather see an X-Men TV show. It has soooooo much potential to be purely awesome that I cannot fathom why Marvel hasn't taken advantage of it and done a TV show already. Technology has more than caught up so it could EASILY be able to sustain a believable X-Men TV show now. And hey, Patrick Stewart could reprise his role as Xavier.

Ms. Marvel TV show could work as well.

Nova could work if he stayed on Earth.

Captain America could work as well.

She-Hulk could work. I would say Hulk, but he's already had his (boring) show.

Spider-Man could work.






It's interesting that a hero/villain performs one amazing feat, or use a power they haven't used for 20+ years, and that automatically propels them to a high status despite scans and evidence to the contrary. I don't know what is worse, selective feat picking that has only been done once or twice 20, or more, years ago or ignoring evidence from scans or the lack thereof. We need to stop putting our favorite heroes/villains on pedestals and start putting them where they really belong. But it's evident that people never will because they would rather accuse others of cherry picking feats, when they don't, and being 'morally superior' when they aren't. I guess being honest and as fair as possible only opens one up to being the target of childish accusations and fault finding by those who insist on acting petty and childish. What happened to a good debate between two civil, mature, adults?
Posted with Microsoft Internet Explorer 6.0 on Windows 7
Alvaro's Comicboards powered by On Topic™ © 2003-2022 Powermad Software
All the content of these boards Copyright © 1996-2022 by Comicboards/TVShowboards. Software Copyright © 2003-2022 Powermad Software