Amazing Spider-Man Message Board >> View Post
·
Post By
Spiffy

In Reply To
Mr Honey Bunny

Subj: Re: Can't work ...
Posted: Tue May 01, 2007 at 10:16:18 pm EDT (Viewed 1 times)
Reply Subj: Can't work ...
Posted: Tue May 01, 2007 at 02:35:32 pm EDT (Viewed 1 times)

Previous Post


> > I think Loeb is more the kind of writer they are searching for on the flagship title.
> >
> > To make everyone happy, we could have Loeb on Amazing, Slott on sensational instead of Sacasa and keep PAD on FNSM.
>
> I'd put David on Amazing, but that might be a reach since I always got the feeling that Marvel editorial doesn't like him (although he'd never say so).
>
> Slott takes his place on FNSM.
>
> Sensational could go a lot of ways. I'm not a huge fan of Sacasa, but it could be worse.

It seems FNSM does not sell as much as the two others titles... so Marvel wouldn't take the risk to put PAD on the flagship title.

>
> > > I think Loeb is more the kind of writer they are searching for on the flagship title.
> > >
> > > To make everyone happy, we could have Loeb on Amazing, Slott on sensational instead of Sacasa and keep PAD on FNSM.
> >
> > I'd put David on Amazing, but that might be a reach since I always got the feeling that Marvel editorial doesn't like him (although he'd never say so).
> >
> > Slott takes his place on FNSM.
> >
> > Sensational could go a lot of ways. I'm not a huge fan of Sacasa, but it could be worse.
>
> It seems FNSM does not sell as much as the two others titles... so Marvel wouldn't take the risk to put PAD on the flagship title.

Probably true. But that logic DOES presume that FNSM isn't selling because of HIM as opposed to any number of other reasons (kiddie sounding less well known name; newest book; etc.)


Posted with Mozilla Firefox 2.0.0.2pre on Linux
Alvaro's Comicboards powered by On Topic™ © 2003-2022 Powermad Software
All the content of these boards Copyright © 1996-2022 by Comicboards/TVShowboards. Software Copyright © 2003-2022 Powermad Software