Amazing Spider-Man Message Board >> View Post
·
Post By
Mr. Knees

In Reply To
KaineParker

Subj: I'm not claiming there is a "rule book" of what should and shouldnt be in the title - I'm saying this story is not my taste at all. And I LIKE brand new day even.
Posted: Fri Oct 29, 2010 at 07:03:29 pm EDT (Viewed 131 times)
Reply Subj: Re: Amazing Spider-Man 646
Posted: Fri Oct 29, 2010 at 03:42:14 pm EDT (Viewed 186 times)

Previous Post

Why? Because you don't like it? Why is it that everyone has such a narrow view about what 'belongs in a spidey comic?' Apparently there's a manual lying around somewhere that tells people exactly how to write the character. I never knew that.

KaineParker

I'm not trying to dictate what should or shouldn't be in a Spider-man comic. I'm saying for my personal taste, the less I know about the Osborns reproductive organs and their fertile virility, the better. \:\) I'm still trying to shake images of Norman Osborn's "O face" during Sins Past.

Mr Knees


Posted with Microsoft Internet Explorer 7 on Windows XP
Alvaro's Comicboards powered by On Topic™ © 2003-2022 Powermad Software
All the content of these boards Copyright © 1996-2022 by Comicboards/TVShowboards. Software Copyright © 2003-2022 Powermad Software