Amazing Spider-Man Message Board - Re: .....holy crap.

Post By

Pengi

In Reply To

The Green Ninjas

Subj: Re: .....holy crap.
Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 at 10:49:54 pm EST (Viewed 147 times)

Reply Subj: Re: .....holy crap.
Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 at 09:15:11 pm EST (Viewed 172 times)

<< Prev

NewEmailPrintRSSIndex

Quote:

I'm amazed that the outrage over the Menace-Baby not being Norman's blew over as quickly as it did.

Really? That was an un-twist. First we were told it was Harry's, then we got the twist that it was Norman's and then oh wait it is Harry's after all.

A twist can get a big reaction. Reversing a twist, even when it's absolutely the right thing to do, traditionally doesn't get much of a reaction.

Posted with Mozilla Firefox 3.6.12 on Windows 7

NewEmailPrintRSSIndex

Amazing #649 thoughts [Spoilers] · Tobias Funke · Wed Nov 24, 2010 at 04:33:29 pm EST
- My Thoughts on Amazing Spider-Man #649 [Spoilers] · stillanerd · Sun Nov 28, 2010 at 01:21:51 pm EST
  - One minor nitpick [Spoilers] · Blargh · Sun Nov 28, 2010 at 07:22:22 pm EST
    - Re: One minor nitpick [Spoilers] · stillanerd · Sun Nov 28, 2010 at 08:50:01 pm EST
      - Re: One minor nitpick [Spoilers] · Blargh · Sun Nov 28, 2010 at 08:54:21 pm EST
        
        Re: One minor nitpick [Spoilers] · Comp · Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 08:21:52 am EST
        Re: One minor nitpick [Spoilers] · stillanerd · Sun Nov 28, 2010 at 09:08:55 pm EST
        
        Re: One minor nitpick [Spoilers] · Richard L · Tue Nov 30, 2010 at 01:32:03 pm EST
        
        How about you speak for yourself, not for 'kids'? [Spoilers] · ireactions · Sat Dec 04, 2010 at 02:56:54 pm EST
        
        Re: How about you speak for yourself, not for 'kids'? [Spoilers] · Comp · Sun Dec 05, 2010 at 11:04:11 pm EST
        
        maybe so, yet -- [Spoilers] · ireactions · Mon Dec 06, 2010 at 08:16:31 pm EST
        
        Re: maybe so, yet -- [Spoilers] · Comp · Tue Dec 07, 2010 at 07:44:44 am EST
- Re: Amazing #649 thoughts [Spoilers] · MichiganWebhead · Sat Nov 27, 2010 at 07:58:16 am EST
  - Re: Amazing #649 thoughts [Spoilers] · Comp · Sat Nov 27, 2010 at 08:14:03 am EST
    - Re: Amazing #649 thoughts [Spoilers] · Pengi · Sat Nov 27, 2010 at 08:45:57 am EST
    - Re: Amazing #649 thoughts [Spoilers] · MichiganWebhead · Sat Nov 27, 2010 at 08:18:56 am EST
    - Re: Amazing #649 thoughts [Spoilers] · Ned Leeds Jr. · Sat Nov 27, 2010 at 08:18:07 am EST
- This was one of the best issues of the last 10 years [Spoilers] · esskay · Fri Nov 26, 2010 at 06:04:50 pm EST
  - Re: Ditto all and then some. LOVED this amazing issue big time!!! 'Nuff said. (no text) [Spoilers] · emerick-man · Wed Dec 01, 2010 at 10:17:02 pm EST
- Re: Amazing #649 thoughts [Spoilers] · KaineParker · Thu Nov 25, 2010 at 06:45:32 pm EST
  - Re: Amazing #649 thoughts [Spoilers] · Jeremiah Ecks · Fri Nov 26, 2010 at 03:52:20 am EST
- Re: Amazing #649 thoughts [Spoilers] · Epidot · Thu Nov 25, 2010 at 04:56:11 pm EST
- There's an easy "out" [SPOILERS] [Spoilers] · Pengi · Thu Nov 25, 2010 at 01:57:59 pm EST
  - Or they could just say it was a Life Model Decoy [Spoilers] · Tobias Funke · Thu Nov 25, 2010 at 05:06:52 pm EST
    - Re: Or they could just say it was a Life Model Decoy [Spoilers] · Pengi · Thu Nov 25, 2010 at 06:18:41 pm EST
      - Re: There is no way that Kingsley is..... [Spoilers] · Iron Man Unit 007 · Sat Nov 27, 2010 at 04:19:33 am EST
        
        Re: There is no way that Kingsley is..... [Spoilers] · Epidot · Sun Nov 28, 2010 at 07:54:27 am EST
        
        Re: There is no way that Kingsley is..... [Spoilers] · Iron Man Unit 007 · Sun Nov 28, 2010 at 12:16:30 pm EST
        
        Re: There is no way that Kingsley is..... [Spoilers] · Epidot · Sun Nov 28, 2010 at 05:34:09 pm EST
        
        Re: There is no way that Kingsley is..... [Spoilers] · Pengi · Sat Nov 27, 2010 at 08:36:37 am EST
- An ode to the fallen [Spoilers] · Unstable Molecule · Thu Nov 25, 2010 at 01:40:12 pm EST
  - Dude... [Spoilers] · Blargh · Thu Nov 25, 2010 at 07:23:19 pm EST
    - Re: Dude... [Spoilers] · Unstable Molecule · Fri Nov 26, 2010 at 03:38:25 pm EST
- .....holy crap. [Spoilers] · The Green Ninjas · Wed Nov 24, 2010 at 08:40:00 pm EST
  - Re: .....holy crap. [Spoilers] · Jeremiah Ecks · Thu Nov 25, 2010 at 09:22:44 am EST
    - Re: .....holy crap. [Spoilers] · TheChamp · Fri Nov 26, 2010 at 10:51:21 am EST
    - Re: .....holy crap. [Spoilers] · Comp · Thu Nov 25, 2010 at 12:59:14 pm EST
      - Re: .....holy crap. [Spoilers] · Omar Karindu · Thu Nov 25, 2010 at 07:26:07 pm EST
        
        Re: .....holy crap. [Spoilers] · The Green Ninjas · Thu Nov 25, 2010 at 09:15:11 pm EST
        
        Re: .....holy crap. [Spoilers] · Michael · Sat Nov 27, 2010 at 11:45:03 am EST
        
        Thanks for the heads-up. [Spoilers] · The Green Ninjas · Sun Nov 28, 2010 at 08:32:00 pm EST
        
        Re: .....holy crap. [Spoilers] · Pengi · Thu Nov 25, 2010 at 10:49:54 pm EST
      - Re: .....holy crap. [Spoilers] · Pengi · Thu Nov 25, 2010 at 01:22:36 pm EST
        
        Re: .....holy crap. [Spoilers] · Comp · Thu Nov 25, 2010 at 09:12:55 pm EST
        
        Re: .....holy crap. [Spoilers] · Pengi · Thu Nov 25, 2010 at 10:44:13 pm EST
- Re: Amazing #649 thoughts [Spoilers] · Webline · Wed Nov 24, 2010 at 07:21:42 pm EST
- Re: Amazing #649 thoughts [Spoilers] · Anansi · Wed Nov 24, 2010 at 07:17:19 pm EST
- Actually Phil Urich's state of mind was set up in the Loners mini. Spoilers.. [Spoilers] · Zevad · Wed Nov 24, 2010 at 06:08:49 pm EST
  - Loners only sold in the 15,000 range, nobody read it [Spoilers] · Tobias Funke · Thu Nov 25, 2010 at 10:50:49 am EST
    - Re: Loners only sold in the 15,000 range, nobody read it [Spoilers] · Ned Leeds Jr. · Fri Nov 26, 2010 at 07:28:45 am EST
      - Re: Loners only sold in the 15,000 range, nobody read it [Spoilers] · Menshevik · Fri Nov 26, 2010 at 11:29:20 am EST
        
        Re: Loners only sold in the 15,000 range, nobody read it [Spoilers] · Pengi · Sat Nov 27, 2010 at 10:09:54 am EST
        Re: Loners only sold in the 15,000 range, nobody read it [Spoilers] · Ned Leeds Jr. · Fri Nov 26, 2010 at 12:45:18 pm EST
        
        Re: Loners only sold in the 15,000 range, nobody read it [Spoilers] · Menshevik · Fri Nov 26, 2010 at 03:00:51 pm EST
        
        Re: Loners only sold in the 15,000 range, nobody read it [Spoilers] · Ned Leeds Jr. · Fri Nov 26, 2010 at 03:54:43 pm EST
        
        Re: Loners only sold in the 15,000 range, nobody read it [Spoilers] · Michael · Sat Nov 27, 2010 at 11:52:57 am EST
        
        Re: Loners only sold in the 15,000 range, nobody read it [Spoilers] · Blargh · Sat Nov 27, 2010 at 04:27:34 pm EST
        
        Re: Loners only sold in the 15,000 range, nobody read it [Spoilers] · Jim M · Sat Dec 04, 2010 at 06:28:23 pm EST
        Re: Loners only sold in the 15,000 range, nobody read it [Spoilers] · Michael · Sat Nov 27, 2010 at 07:08:40 pm EST
- Re: Amazing #649 thoughts [Spoilers] · Edward Whelan · Wed Nov 24, 2010 at 04:46:35 pm EST
  - Re: Amazing #649 thoughts [Spoilers] · Duhyeager · Wed Nov 24, 2010 at 05:11:35 pm EST
    - Re: Amazing #649 thoughts [Spoilers] · MichiganWebhead · Sat Nov 27, 2010 at 01:43:24 pm EST
    - Re: Amazing #649 thoughts [Spoilers] · Menshevik · Thu Nov 25, 2010 at 04:16:10 am EST
      - Re: Amazing #649 thoughts [Spoilers] · Cbasfrench · Thu Nov 25, 2010 at 07:40:12 am EST