Amazing Spider-Man Message Board - Re: Amazing #649 thoughts

Post By

Comp

Moderator

Location: Owings Mills, MD
Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008
Posts: 1,976

In Reply To

MichiganWebhead

Subj: Re: Amazing #649 thoughts
Posted: Sat Nov 27, 2010 at 08:14:03 am EST (Viewed 164 times)

Reply Subj: Re: Amazing #649 thoughts
Posted: Sat Nov 27, 2010 at 07:58:16 am EST (Viewed 169 times)

<< Prev

NewEmailPrintRSSIndex

Next >>

Quote:

I agree with some of the other posts on here-- odd that you never see him without his mask (the imagery of Hobby walking around, in full costume, wearing an overcoat seems... weird... at least would have taken the mask off?)

Oh, wait, he had his mask on? Now that's different. To me, that makes it outright probable that Roderick Kingsley wasn't killed.

-Comp

My first novel, The Listeners, is in bookstores now! Check it out at www.harrisondemchick.com!

Posted with Mozilla Firefox 3.6.12 on Windows 7

NewEmailPrintRSSIndex

Amazing #649 thoughts [Spoilers] · Tobias Funke · Wed Nov 24, 2010 at 04:33:29 pm EST
- My Thoughts on Amazing Spider-Man #649 [Spoilers] · stillanerd · Sun Nov 28, 2010 at 01:21:51 pm EST
  - One minor nitpick [Spoilers] · Blargh · Sun Nov 28, 2010 at 07:22:22 pm EST
    - Re: One minor nitpick [Spoilers] · stillanerd · Sun Nov 28, 2010 at 08:50:01 pm EST
      - Re: One minor nitpick [Spoilers] · Blargh · Sun Nov 28, 2010 at 08:54:21 pm EST
        
        Re: One minor nitpick [Spoilers] · Comp · Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 08:21:52 am EST
        Re: One minor nitpick [Spoilers] · stillanerd · Sun Nov 28, 2010 at 09:08:55 pm EST
        
        Re: One minor nitpick [Spoilers] · Richard L · Tue Nov 30, 2010 at 01:32:03 pm EST
        
        How about you speak for yourself, not for 'kids'? [Spoilers] · ireactions · Sat Dec 04, 2010 at 02:56:54 pm EST
        
        Re: How about you speak for yourself, not for 'kids'? [Spoilers] · Comp · Sun Dec 05, 2010 at 11:04:11 pm EST
        
        maybe so, yet -- [Spoilers] · ireactions · Mon Dec 06, 2010 at 08:16:31 pm EST
        
        Re: maybe so, yet -- [Spoilers] · Comp · Tue Dec 07, 2010 at 07:44:44 am EST
- Re: Amazing #649 thoughts [Spoilers] · MichiganWebhead · Sat Nov 27, 2010 at 07:58:16 am EST
  - Re: Amazing #649 thoughts [Spoilers] · Comp · Sat Nov 27, 2010 at 08:14:03 am EST
    - Re: Amazing #649 thoughts [Spoilers] · Pengi · Sat Nov 27, 2010 at 08:45:57 am EST
    - Re: Amazing #649 thoughts [Spoilers] · MichiganWebhead · Sat Nov 27, 2010 at 08:18:56 am EST
    - Re: Amazing #649 thoughts [Spoilers] · Ned Leeds Jr. · Sat Nov 27, 2010 at 08:18:07 am EST
- This was one of the best issues of the last 10 years [Spoilers] · esskay · Fri Nov 26, 2010 at 06:04:50 pm EST
  - Re: Ditto all and then some. LOVED this amazing issue big time!!! 'Nuff said. (no text) [Spoilers] · emerick-man · Wed Dec 01, 2010 at 10:17:02 pm EST
- Re: Amazing #649 thoughts [Spoilers] · KaineParker · Thu Nov 25, 2010 at 06:45:32 pm EST
  - Re: Amazing #649 thoughts [Spoilers] · Jeremiah Ecks · Fri Nov 26, 2010 at 03:52:20 am EST
- Re: Amazing #649 thoughts [Spoilers] · Epidot · Thu Nov 25, 2010 at 04:56:11 pm EST
- There's an easy "out" [SPOILERS] [Spoilers] · Pengi · Thu Nov 25, 2010 at 01:57:59 pm EST
  - Or they could just say it was a Life Model Decoy [Spoilers] · Tobias Funke · Thu Nov 25, 2010 at 05:06:52 pm EST
    - Re: Or they could just say it was a Life Model Decoy [Spoilers] · Pengi · Thu Nov 25, 2010 at 06:18:41 pm EST
      - Re: There is no way that Kingsley is..... [Spoilers] · Iron Man Unit 007 · Sat Nov 27, 2010 at 04:19:33 am EST
        
        Re: There is no way that Kingsley is..... [Spoilers] · Epidot · Sun Nov 28, 2010 at 07:54:27 am EST
        
        Re: There is no way that Kingsley is..... [Spoilers] · Iron Man Unit 007 · Sun Nov 28, 2010 at 12:16:30 pm EST
        
        Re: There is no way that Kingsley is..... [Spoilers] · Epidot · Sun Nov 28, 2010 at 05:34:09 pm EST
        
        Re: There is no way that Kingsley is..... [Spoilers] · Pengi · Sat Nov 27, 2010 at 08:36:37 am EST
- An ode to the fallen [Spoilers] · Unstable Molecule · Thu Nov 25, 2010 at 01:40:12 pm EST
  - Dude... [Spoilers] · Blargh · Thu Nov 25, 2010 at 07:23:19 pm EST
    - Re: Dude... [Spoilers] · Unstable Molecule · Fri Nov 26, 2010 at 03:38:25 pm EST
- .....holy crap. [Spoilers] · The Green Ninjas · Wed Nov 24, 2010 at 08:40:00 pm EST
  - Re: .....holy crap. [Spoilers] · Jeremiah Ecks · Thu Nov 25, 2010 at 09:22:44 am EST
    - Re: .....holy crap. [Spoilers] · TheChamp · Fri Nov 26, 2010 at 10:51:21 am EST
    - Re: .....holy crap. [Spoilers] · Comp · Thu Nov 25, 2010 at 12:59:14 pm EST
      - Re: .....holy crap. [Spoilers] · Omar Karindu · Thu Nov 25, 2010 at 07:26:07 pm EST
        
        Re: .....holy crap. [Spoilers] · The Green Ninjas · Thu Nov 25, 2010 at 09:15:11 pm EST
        
        Re: .....holy crap. [Spoilers] · Michael · Sat Nov 27, 2010 at 11:45:03 am EST
        
        Thanks for the heads-up. [Spoilers] · The Green Ninjas · Sun Nov 28, 2010 at 08:32:00 pm EST
        
        Re: .....holy crap. [Spoilers] · Pengi · Thu Nov 25, 2010 at 10:49:54 pm EST
      - Re: .....holy crap. [Spoilers] · Pengi · Thu Nov 25, 2010 at 01:22:36 pm EST
        
        Re: .....holy crap. [Spoilers] · Comp · Thu Nov 25, 2010 at 09:12:55 pm EST
        
        Re: .....holy crap. [Spoilers] · Pengi · Thu Nov 25, 2010 at 10:44:13 pm EST
- Re: Amazing #649 thoughts [Spoilers] · Webline · Wed Nov 24, 2010 at 07:21:42 pm EST
- Re: Amazing #649 thoughts [Spoilers] · Anansi · Wed Nov 24, 2010 at 07:17:19 pm EST
- Actually Phil Urich's state of mind was set up in the Loners mini. Spoilers.. [Spoilers] · Zevad · Wed Nov 24, 2010 at 06:08:49 pm EST
  - Loners only sold in the 15,000 range, nobody read it [Spoilers] · Tobias Funke · Thu Nov 25, 2010 at 10:50:49 am EST
    - Re: Loners only sold in the 15,000 range, nobody read it [Spoilers] · Ned Leeds Jr. · Fri Nov 26, 2010 at 07:28:45 am EST
      - Re: Loners only sold in the 15,000 range, nobody read it [Spoilers] · Menshevik · Fri Nov 26, 2010 at 11:29:20 am EST
        
        Re: Loners only sold in the 15,000 range, nobody read it [Spoilers] · Pengi · Sat Nov 27, 2010 at 10:09:54 am EST
        Re: Loners only sold in the 15,000 range, nobody read it [Spoilers] · Ned Leeds Jr. · Fri Nov 26, 2010 at 12:45:18 pm EST
        
        Re: Loners only sold in the 15,000 range, nobody read it [Spoilers] · Menshevik · Fri Nov 26, 2010 at 03:00:51 pm EST
        
        Re: Loners only sold in the 15,000 range, nobody read it [Spoilers] · Ned Leeds Jr. · Fri Nov 26, 2010 at 03:54:43 pm EST
        
        Re: Loners only sold in the 15,000 range, nobody read it [Spoilers] · Michael · Sat Nov 27, 2010 at 11:52:57 am EST
        
        Re: Loners only sold in the 15,000 range, nobody read it [Spoilers] · Blargh · Sat Nov 27, 2010 at 04:27:34 pm EST
        
        Re: Loners only sold in the 15,000 range, nobody read it [Spoilers] · Jim M · Sat Dec 04, 2010 at 06:28:23 pm EST
        Re: Loners only sold in the 15,000 range, nobody read it [Spoilers] · Michael · Sat Nov 27, 2010 at 07:08:40 pm EST
- Re: Amazing #649 thoughts [Spoilers] · Edward Whelan · Wed Nov 24, 2010 at 04:46:35 pm EST
  - Re: Amazing #649 thoughts [Spoilers] · Duhyeager · Wed Nov 24, 2010 at 05:11:35 pm EST
    - Re: Amazing #649 thoughts [Spoilers] · MichiganWebhead · Sat Nov 27, 2010 at 01:43:24 pm EST
    - Re: Amazing #649 thoughts [Spoilers] · Menshevik · Thu Nov 25, 2010 at 04:16:10 am EST
      - Re: Amazing #649 thoughts [Spoilers] · Cbasfrench · Thu Nov 25, 2010 at 07:40:12 am EST