Amazing Spider-Man Message Board >> View Post
·
Post By
Pengi

In Reply To
Comicguy1

Subj: Re: When You Think About It, Isn't Daniel Kingsley Kind Of Stupid And Contrived?
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 at 10:39:02 pm EST (Viewed 14 times)
Reply Subj: When You Think About It, Isn't Daniel Kingsley Kind Of Stupid And Contrived?
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 at 05:51:18 pm EST (Viewed 237 times)

Previous Post

So, think about this. Roderick is the Hobgoblin, but he has an IDENTICAL twin brother. Sounds like a soap opera plot and trope doesn't it? Sounds kind of like a cheat. It seems that Stern (Roger, who created the Hobgoblin.) was getting around the whole Roderick being the Hobgoblin when the two of them were together in the same room at the same time (Which I believe is why Tom Defalco didn't want to reveal Kingsley as the Hobgoblin.)by using Daniel. So yeah, Daniel isn't really a "character" character, but isn't it kind of stupid and soap operary? Then again, I liked Macendale as the Hobgoblin (Overall.), so maybe I'm in the minority. And speaking of, did they ever give us a reason as to why Phil turned into a raving loon? I hear that the REAL Hobgoblin (Kinglsey.) is back. What's he up to? I hear that he was working as a mercenary (The Black Spider or Tarantula or something.), which seems more like Macendale's deal. I wonder if Slott brought him back because of all of the negativity surrounding his death. And it was pretty dam convenient that Phil was in one of his hideouts at that exact time. Anyhow-

They're not twins, they just look almost identical. It'd make more sense if they were twins, really.


Posted with Mozilla Firefox 16.0 on Windows 7
Alvaro's Comicboards powered by On Topic™ © 2003-2022 Powermad Software
All the content of these boards Copyright © 1996-2022 by Comicboards/TVShowboards. Software Copyright © 2003-2022 Powermad Software