Amazing Spider-Man Message Board >> View Post
·
Post By
The Silver Surfer

Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008
In Reply To
Quoyle

Member Since: Sat Oct 08, 2016
Subj: Re: Steve Ditko estate seeks to reclaim Spider-man and Dr Strange rights
Posted: Sun Sep 26, 2021 at 06:31:34 am EDT (Viewed 119 times)
Reply Subj: Re: Steve Ditko estate seeks to reclaim Spider-man and Dr Strange rights
Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2021 at 01:26:18 pm EDT (Viewed 155 times)

Previous Post

If it was something Steve Ditko was entitled to he would have reclaimed it years ago. This is a cynical move for a pay off made by Steve’s brother who never created shit himself anyway.
Steve Ditko was an Objectivist and believed in payment and trade for work done. If he believed he was being stolen from he would have done something about it while both he and Stan Lee were alive.
Personally I have noticed that after Steve Ditko quit Marvel he never did anything with mass appeal or indeed any proper comicbook ever again. It seems strange to me. Either Steve was creatively dry or he was burned by how Marvel and Stan treated him. He refused all interviews and became a near recluse.
Patrick Ditko just wants cash for doing nothing and is entitled to nothing. After all it can’t be a coincidence he has pulled this when a Spidey and Doctor Strange starring movie is no coincidence. They sat there at home and said, ‘Hey my brother was involved in creating that! Maybe I can cash in!’

I don't think you even have to go that deep into it.

One person doing everything for a character is a great story. That guy getting screwed out of credit is an even better one. That is why the legend that Stan Lee stole credit for everything from Jack Kirby and Steve Ditko has become so popular... it is a good story.

Unfortunately, neither one of their solo work bares any reality to that claim. Both were good idea men, Ditko a good plotter, but both were God awful with character.

Kirby's dialogue is especially bad, and I personally find his return to Captain America in the 70s un-f###ing-readable.

Ditko tried to recreate Spider-Man twice. Once with Blue Beetle (who was a far cry from what Dematteis and Giffen turned him into) and with teenage characters Hawk and Dove.

Both had interesting plots, and Hawk and Dove a cool idea, but the characters were a little flat.

Maybe Ditko believed he got wronged, or just never bothered to openly correct things.

Ditko's son may honestly think he is correcting a wrong, because he loved his fate4hr..


But,m even if everything I said abut eh stealing idea being a lie is false... and it isn't...it does not matter. They signed the contract.

As some one who has been a freelancer/independent contractor since I was 19, If you don;t like the terms, and still sign the contract, you are screwed.

Siegel and Shuster won a lawsuit saying they should get credit. Well, Ditko gets credit. Even back in the day, he got credit... some of the early spider-man books even went so far as to point out that he plotted the story.


Posted with Mozilla Firefox 92.0 on Windows 10
Alvaro's Comicboards powered by On Topic™ © 2003-2022 Powermad Software
All the content of these boards Copyright © 1996-2022 by Comicboards/TVShowboards. Software Copyright © 2003-2022 Powermad Software