Amazing Spider-Man Message Board >> View Post
Post By
Revolutionary_Jack

Member Since: Fri Nov 26, 2021
In Reply To
Happy Hogan 
Manager

Location: Northern Virginia
Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008
Posts: 4,440
Subj: Re: Ditko, Objectivism, Marvel: A Time for Reassessment?
Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2022 at 04:06:35 am EDT (Viewed 86 times)
Reply Subj: Re: Ditko, Objectivism, Marvel: A Time for Reassessment?
Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2022 at 12:10:35 am EDT (Viewed 94 times)



    Quote:
    Having read your article, I have one question:
    I see the words "objectivist" and "randian" a lot, (both in your article and in the real world) and outside your article, they seem to be used interchangeably. Can you explain the difference between the words in your own head cannon.


For me it's the same thing. Randian is a synonym for Objectivism and vice versa, and I alternate words to avoid repetition. Objectivism capitalized is of course different from lower-case objectivity and so on, so I mean it in terms of how Rand asserted things.


    Quote:
    As far as Stan Lee censoring a Kirby satire of Ayn Rand, I didn't read anything more into that than Lee not wanting to seem disrespectful. I'm curious if he read what Kirby said about it first. Is it possible that Lee didn't think Kirby was the right person to do the satire well?


It might be an attempt to put Kirby in his place, and snobbishly insisting that Kirby is too stupid to understand Rand, so that might be a thing too. I leaned towards Lee being a Randian but others can make different conclusions.


    Quote:
    With comics like The Dark Knight and Watchmen, not to mention some of Ditko's other work, Rand's influence on comics seems to be far-reaching.


Rand had an impact in real-world society when one of her acolytes became the Chair of the US Federal Reserve. So it would be a surprise that her influence doesn't show up in comics as it has in movies, advertising, games.






https://elvingsmusings.wordpress.com/