Subj: Yes and it's far superior to the originalPosted: Mon Aug 16, 2021 at 11:18:10 am EDT (Viewed 131 times)
Reply Subj: Any Here see the Richard Donner SupermanII movie then?
Posted: Thu Aug 12, 2021 at 11:15:34 am EDT (Viewed 151 times)
really late to the party, just watched it last night, and though much superior to the original movie when first presented!
Lois finds out Clark Supes by firing pistol blank at him and his reaction, much better to have him interact with Marlon as Jor El, even how he lost and regained powers!
Only thing would have changed was ending, another time used reversing time, just as did in first movie!
Glad the hookey geletin shield out, as was rest of the "jokes" from before!
even though I enjoyed the original as well.
It's interesting that a hero/villain performs one amazing feat, or use a power they haven't used for 20+ years, and that automatically propels them to a high status despite scans and evidence to the contrary. I don't know what is worse, selective feat picking that has only been done once or twice 20, or more, years ago or ignoring evidence from scans or the lack thereof. We need to stop putting our favorite heroes/villains on pedestals and start putting them where they really belong. But it's evident that people never will because they would rather accuse others of cherry picking feats, when they don't, and being 'morally superior' when they aren't. I guess being honest and as fair as possible only opens one up to being the target of childish accusations and fault finding by those who insist on acting petty and childish. What happened to a good debate between two civil, mature, adults?