The Thor Message Board >> View Post
·
Post By
Would be Watcher

Location: Canada
Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008
In Reply To
Jonathanos

Member Since: Mon Feb 15, 2010
Posts: 2,301
Subj: Re: The bottom line
Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2011 at 08:46:37 am EST (Viewed 194 times)
Reply Subj: Re: The bottom line
Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2011 at 08:29:41 am EST (Viewed 213 times)




    Quote:

      Quote:

      KB, decided to have Thor be KO by a special bullet, mind you, because he felt there was more evidence pointing to Thor not being outright impervious to that kind of attack than the opposite.



    Quote:
    It was actually Priest who wrote the scene.  As I recall from Busiek's (many) discussions on this topic:

     
    Priest spoke with Brevoort and Busiek about shooting an Avenger in the head with a grazing shot and Busiek suggested shooting Thor directly in the head because 1) a grazing shot was a cliché and 2) Thor would survive because the bullet would bounce (or flatten) against his skull.
     
    Busiek later said there was no discussion of a special bullet.  (Nothing in the issue suggests it was a special bullet, iirc.)  He also said that he didn't believe it should have kayoed Thor.

In that case, I see less and less reason to hate the guy. His POV was clearly that Thor could handle bullets without fear for his life. The only thing was, it could pierce his skin and do some superficial damage instead of simply bouncing of his chest. 





Posted with Google Chrome 15.0.874.121 on Windows XP
Alvaro's Comicboards powered by On Topic™ © 2003-2022 Powermad Software
All the content of these boards Copyright © 1996-2022 by Comicboards/TVShowboards. Software Copyright © 2003-2022 Powermad Software