The Thor Message Board >> View Post
Post By

Member Since: Sun Jan 02, 2011
Posts: 3,786
In Reply To

Member Since: Mon Feb 15, 2010
Posts: 2,301
Subj: Re: The bottom line
Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2011 at 06:04:14 pm EST (Viewed 87 times)
Reply Subj: Re: The bottom line
Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2011 at 04:27:40 pm EST (Viewed 108 times)

    3) There is evidence that Thor is bulletproof and not bulletproof, and anyone claiming otherwise is wrong.

Sure. It's just that the evidence in favour of Thor being bulletproof totally eclipses the not-bulletproof-evidence. There's no way to look at the evidence and reach Busiek's conclusion, unless you pull a Brevoort and selectively dismiss evidence.

Yes, Thor has shown a wariness of bullets, but he has also taken them repeatedly without significant injury. It doesn't take genius to come up with a plausible explanation, unless you don't want Thor to be bulletproof. Don't insult my intelligence by telling me that the evidence supports that position, however.

Posted with Apple Safari 5.1.2 on MacOS X
Alvaro's Comicboards powered by On Topic™ © 2003-2022 Powermad Software
All the content of these boards Copyright © 1996-2022 by Comicboards/TVShowboards. Software Copyright © 2003-2022 Powermad Software