The Thor Message Board >> View Post
Post By
Norvell

Member Since: Sun Jan 02, 2011
Posts: 3,786
In Reply To
Jonathanos

Member Since: Mon Feb 15, 2010
Posts: 2,301
Subj: Re: The bottom line
Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2011 at 08:20:12 pm EST (Viewed 121 times)
Reply Subj: Re: The bottom line
Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2011 at 07:20:08 pm EST (Viewed 122 times)

Previous Post


    Quote:
    Sure. It's just that the evidence in favour of Thor being bulletproof totally eclipses the not-bulletproof-evidence. There's no way to look at the evidence and reach Busiek's conclusion, unless you pull a Brevoort and selectively dismiss evidence.

    Yes, Thor has shown a wariness of bullets, but he has also taken them repeatedly without significant injury. It doesn't take genius to come up with a plausible explanation, unless you don't want Thor to be bulletproof. Don't insult my intelligence by telling me that the evidence supports that position, however.


It doesn't eclipse it, though.

Yeah, it eclipses it.